"It should be evident that the Knights Templars were not the conscious conduit between the murderous Islamic cults and the Illuminati [but in fact their members, as this author admits, were in fact just that - tainted and corrupted, the order was guilty - Ed. note]. On the contrary, the Knights Templars were a vehicle for the forces of Creation that the Overlords of Chaos seek to destroy. The Dark Gods that work to usurp Creation were the spiritual enemies of the Knights Templars and so they actively worked to destroy them. Although the evil Nizari Isma'ilite cult inspired murderous secret societies in Europe, the spiritual link between them was not the Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon per se, but Crusading knights who worshipped the Dark Gods [who were in fact the leading members of the Knights Templar - Ed. note]."
Illuminati 4
|
 | ||
 The chief suspects in this crime against humanity has been the Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, better known as the Knights Templars. Most conspiracies involving the Knights Templars argue that they were an instrument of Evil. This is a gross error. They were in fact a tool of very different forces that wished to forge the emerging European civilisation according to the Christ Impulse released by the event at Golgotha. The Templars were the means by which a new code of conduct between men, between the sexes and between the nations was to be introduced throughout Europe. This band of brother knightswas formed during the early years of the kingdom of Jerusalem, when the Crusaders controlled only a few strongholds in the Holy Land, ostensibly to protect pilgrims from marauding Muslim bands. At this time, theFirst Crusades had ended nineteen years previously, Godefroi de Bouillon had been enthroned as king of Jerusalem, and yet safety within the Holy Land was precarious due to the incessant predatory Muslim warbands.Pitying the plight of pilgrims, nine French gentilshommes, led by Hugues de Payens and Godefroi de Saint-Omer, vowed in 1119 to devote themselves to their protection and thus created an Order for the protection of pilgrims to the Holy Sepulchre. Baldwin II, the recently installed king of Jerusalem, gave them quarters in a wing of the royal palace near the site of the Temple of Solomon. It was from this apparently fortuitous accommodation address that the Order derived their famous name of Knights Templar. The Templars were essentially a group of secular knights who banded together and took monastic vows. Ostensibly, they were a monastic military order created to protect Christian pilgrims on route to the Holy Land, and in this sense, they were the first of the Warrior Monks. Emblazoned on the Order's banner was the motto: "Non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam."  The Order had a hierarchy of four classes: knights, sergeants, chaplains and servants. The Templars' distinctive regalia, a white surcoat marked with a red cross could only be worn by the Knights. A Grand Master headed the Order, and a commander who owed obedience to the grand master ruled each auxiliary branch, or temple. The original purpose for the Order's existence was served well by the founding member knights who performed courageous service in the Holy Land. The celebrity of the Order was assured by the propaganda writing of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, who in 1128 also wrote their rule of life under which the Knights Templar were bound by the vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience. Moreover, although the Templars had originally vowed obedience to the patriarch of Jerusalem, Pope Innocent II in 1139 placed the Templars directly under the pope's authority. This meant that the Templars were a privileged Order under Rome and exempted from the jurisdiction of any bishop in whose diocese they might hold property. It also ensured that they were immune from the temporal ambitions of kings. Thus, the conditions for the Order's meteoric rise to fame, wealth and power were put in place, as well as the design for the Order's ultimate destruction.Although the Templars distinguished themselves by many deeds of valour and integrity, the regulation that they were to live solely on alms caused donations of immense wealth to be given to the Order by a grateful and admiring Christendom. Thus, lordships, castles, seigniories and estates were given to the Order by the kings and great nobles of Spain, France and England. These copious donations coupled to the freedom granted to them by the Pope allowed the Templars to rapidly diversify their activities throughout Europe and the Levant. At its height, the Order numbered about 20,000 Templars Knights that formed an integral part of the defence strategy of Christendom in its defence of the Christian crusader states of the Holy Land.  The military strength of the Order guaranteed the safety of almost anything placed in its care. Consequently, anyone who desired the safe transportation of valuables across turbulent lands sought the services of the trusted knights. Similarly their network of treasure storehouses were used as safe depositories by canny noblemen in a troubled times. The Templars expanded into banking and were primarily concerned with loaning money in Europe for delivery in Jerusalem, and financing kings and noblemen. They also held the valuables of other knights and executed their wills. Soon the temples of the Order were offering a complete range of banking services to which great noblemen; kings and even popes came to avail themselves of the financial services of the Templars. The Order of Templar Knights quickly became known as the moneylenders to the monarchs.Thus the Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon created the basis of banking, of international banking, vis-à-vis secure depositories, loan arrangements and an efficient transport organisation. The Templars had become the "international financiers" and "international capitalists"of their day and were acquainted with letters of change, and orders payable at sight. The Templars also instituted dividends and annuities on deposited capital, advanced funds, lent on credit, controlled private accounts and undertook to raise taxes for the lay and ecclesiastical seigneurs. Within two centuries, the Order had become so powerful in Christendom that they could defy all authority but the Papal throne. The spectacular rise of the Templars caused others to view them with envy. The riches and power of the Order attracted not only admiration for their charity, integrity and fiscal efficiency but also the hostility of other forces that observed them with enmity. These Dark Forces opposed the spiritual inspiration of Templars and the designs that it had for the evolution of European civilisation using the Order as its tool. These Evil forces worked to extinguish the impulse that was moulding the social architecture of the emerging European nation states.  Medieval Europe was gripped by Evil to a degree that threatened the emergence of Western civilisation founded not only upon Christianity but the true Christ Impulse released from the Cross at Cavalry. The nobility of Europe, using the feudal system of governance, were abusing the inherently oppressive system such that they were bleeding the peasantry dry. All natural resources, the land, animals, plants and trees, belonged to the King and the peasants were denied the unfettered right to hunt, gather food or build shelter to provide the immediate and long-term sustenance for themselves or their family. With the nobility controlling all property, the peasant could only survive by the largesse and whim of their nobles. This massive social injustice to the common man was one of the reasons a benevolent group of minor royalty and clergy instituted the original Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, better known as the Knights Templars. To foster the social conditions to bring about the subtle changes in the souls of men and thus initiate the founding of modern civilisation on the Christ Impulse and all it entrails. The pious men who created the original and true order of Knights Templars did so to protect the common man from the machinations of Evil actingthrough the excesses of wicked or ignorant nobility. The original Templar Charter established the precept of basic human rights (using the term in its proper sense) for all people including the peasantry based on God-given rights granted to each and every human being by virtue of their birth on Earth. This precept of basic human rights read:"Each living being possesses basic divine rights. The most basic right is the right of self-determination. Each and every being upon Earth is divinely given the right to control his own life. Other inalienable divinely granted rights include food, shelter, clothing and fair compensation for work well done."  Thus these warrior monk-knights, all of noble birth, humbled themselves before God, before Christ and before the Pope, and dedicated their Order to the service of Christ and to the Church of Rome. They became known as "The Protectors of Christ" because in essence they worked to protect the Christ Impulse and all it entrails from being extinguished in the souls of men in medieval Europe. The Popes of Rome and most of the nobility were humbled by the Templars service and their humility, whilst the poor, the dispossessed and the weak welcomed their protection. The Knights Templars were a great power in medieval Europe and benevolently controlled the lands for almost 300 years during which time Europe advanced from the "Dark Ages" into the Renaissance. It is not exaggeration therefore to say this on the matter. Modern civilisation was in large measure a product of the beneficent rule and lordship by the Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, better known to history as the Knights Templars.The fall to the Muslims in 1291 of Acre, the last remaining Crusader stronghold in the Holy Land, removed the apparent raison d'être of the Templars. There were also the visible deterioration of certain members of the Order that gave themselves up to pride and ostentation. Compounding these temporal reverses were the rumours circulating that the secret meetings and rituals of the knights contained elements at odds with the professed ethos of the Order. The venal Philip the Fair, King of France, who was inspired by the Dark Forces to betray the Templars, carried out the great act of treachery against the Order. Believing that he acted in the best interests of France, the demonically inspired Philip, on October 13th, 1307, had all the Templars arrested on the grounds of"vehement suspicion" of heresy: For, this was the only charge that would allow him to seize the entire wealth of the Order in France. He charged the Templars with immorality, irreligious practices and blasphemies committed during their secret rites of initiation and worship. Torture of some knights soon provided Philip with the moral ammunition to condemn the Order. His charges against the Templars included trampling and spitting on the cross; homosexuality and sodomy; and the worshipping of the demon Baphomet.   The pope at this time was Clement V, himself a Frenchman, who Philip eventually cowed into suppressing the Order throughout the rest of Christendom. Thus, in March 1312, the Holy See issued the bull Vox in excelsoordering the sequestration of all Templar property in Europe and its transfer to either the knights of the "Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem," commonly known as the Hospitallers, or to the state. Many Templars were executed or imprisoned and on March 19th, 1314 the last Grand Master of the Knights Templar, Jacques de Molay was burned at the stake. The Dark Gods that had feared the growth of theChrist Impulse within the emerging European civilisation acted to extinguish it and thus a powerful tool of this impulse; the Knights Templars were damned to destruction. The forces of Evil that have existed since before Man inspired people and events that eventually destroyed the carefully crafted organisation that sought to provide the Christ Impulse with a more propitious Christendom.Apologists for the Order argue that it was a victim of the greed of the ingrate King Philip who coveted their wealth. Others suggest that the king was more fearful of their power rather than envious of their wealth. Other apologists put forward a theory of a double doctrine. Here it is argued the majority of the Templars were ignorant of the activities and motivations of the inner core of the Order that was anti-monarchical and anti-religious; and who carried out "unspeakable apostasy against God, detestable idolatry, execrable vice, and many [other] heresies." It is well known that the property of the Templars was not appropriated by Philip, but was given by him to the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, commonly known as the Hospitallers. This being the case, then greed and envy were not the primary motives that spurred Philip to action. Other impulses were operating to cause the king to act against the Order. In fact the King was inspired to act against the Knights Templars by forces antithetical to the social and spiritual aims of the Order.  It should be evident that the Knights Templars were not the conscious conduit between the murderous Islamic cults and the Illuminati. On the contrary, the Knights Templars were a vehicle for the forces of Creation that the Overlords of Chaos seek to destroy. The Dark Gods that work to usurp Creation were the spiritual enemies of the Knights Templars and so they actively worked to destroy them. Although the evil Nizari Isma'ilite cult inspired murderous secret societies in Europe, the spiritual link between them was not the Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon per se, but Crusading knights who worshipped the Dark Gods. For, the secret stream of consciousness, bubbling beneath the thin crust of observable history has two tributaries: the "Good" and the "Bad." The Goodthat is the working of the creative impulse of God, and the Bad which is the corrosive influences of the Dark Gods working to thwart the Divine Plan. This dual aspect to reality brings forth two very different disciples: those who worship God, the Creator of all things, and those who worship the Dark Gods of Chaos. The initiatory Knights Templars, guardians of the Christ Impulse, were the disciples of the former: the later Crusader knights who absorbed the creed of theAssassins were disciples of the latter.Thus the Evil template of organised political murder forged in the crucible of evil that was the Dar ul Hikmat, the terrible Grand Lodge of Cairo, was brought into Europe by knights who may or may not have been members of the Order of the Temple. These secret advocates of the Assassins were disciples of Evil, and did not wish to reveal themselves to the scrutiny of history. They remained in the shadows worshipping the Dark Gods, Ahriman and Lucifer and working diligently behind the tableau of historical events to destroy the social experiment that was the Knights Templars. They were members of the Brotherhood of Darkness, the Black Adepts in the Cult of Evil, the ancient Luciferian Priesthood, which has worked to bring the Kingdom of Evil to fruition on Earth since at least 4000 BC. This fraternity of Evil has been an active agent in the secret history of this planet and is responsible for some of the most heinous crimes against God and against mankind: the destruction of the Knights Templars was just one of these many atrocities. It is these disciples of the Dark Gods, theOverlords of Chaos called Satan and Lucifer, who have ceaselessly acted to destroy the Christ Impulse since its inception. They are the standard-bearers of the Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government and are the human agents of the Overlords of Chaos. The baton of Evil was passed to the Illuminati by this ancient Brotherhood of Darkness that both created it and bequeathed it the tenets of Organised Evil formed by Abdullah ibn Maymn and refined by the sect of Hasan-e Sabbah. The structure and ethos of the Assassins became the ultimate model on which all systems of organised murder working through fanaticism, such as the Carbonari and the Irish Republican Brotherhood. Whilst the signs, symbols, and initiations, of the Grand Lodge of Cairo formed the basis for the great secret societies of Europe. It is often said, with the definite purpose of demonising them, that the Knights Templars were the spiritual heirs of the occult conspiracy against God. On the contrary, they were diametrically opposed to the aims of the Black Adepts of the Black Adepts, the Brotherhood of Darkness, and worked to bring a modern European civilisation into existence predicated on the Christ Impulse that was released from the Cross at Calgary. In short, the Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon worked to thwart the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government and therefore they were enemies of those who served the Overlords of Chaos, those who worked to subvert Christendom and, thus, theTemplars were the spiritual enemies of Dark Gods. These secret advocates of the Assassins were disciples of Evil, and did not wish to reveal themselves to the scrutiny of history. They remained in the shadows worshipping the Dark Gods and working diligently behind the tableau of historical events to destroy the social experiment that was the Knights Templars. They were members of the Brotherhood of Darkness, an Evil cabal of Black Adepts that has worked to bring the Kingdom of Evil to fruition on Earth since at least 4000 BC. This Brotherhood of Evil has been an active agent in the secret history of this planet and is responsible for some of the most heinous crimes against God and against mankind: the destruction of the Knights Templars was just one of these many atrocities. It is these disciples of Satan(Ahriman) and Lucifer, the Dark Gods, who have ceaselessly acted to destroy the Christ Impulse since its inception. They are the standard-bearers of the Evil Agenda and are the human agents of the Dark Gods, Ahriman and Lucifer, who are the true Overlords of Chaos. Dark Masters, theBrotherhood of Darkness, have therefore used Black Magic throughout time and across continents to corrupt and ensnare leaders of nations in their Evil web of intrigue. From ancient times in Babylon, Egypt, Israel, Greece and Rome, and up to the present time, wherever this dark Cabal of Evil, the Dark Masters, the Brotherhood of Darkness, the Occult Hierarchy, established itself wickedness, depravity, death and destruction soon followed. For, once the leaders are controlled, the Black Adepts of Ahriman, the Dark Masters could proceed to enslave the people and abuse the land without opposition. Temporal power invariably arises from possession of wealth and money and thus the evil cabal of Black Adepts masquerade as moneylenders and international bankers to garner both, yet in a grotesque parody of the enterprise instituted by theKnights Templars. These evil usurers have insinuated themselves into the confidences of people, the leaders of society, who have then been corrupted by the temporal treasures offered by their allegiance to the Evil cabal of Black Adepts. The evil usurers, the international financiers and bankers, owe no allegiance to anyone or any country and will and do betray anyone and any country because they believe that they serve a higher purpose, which is the Great Conspiracy against God. These evil men, the rootless and venal usurers, have a long history of using wars not only to make money and to consolidate their power, but also to destroy the bloodlines of families and races that are an obstacle to the Evil Agenda. This is why Baron Amschel Rothschild who, like the rest of his clan, was up to his neck in the Evil Agenda for the establishment of World Government could tell us without irony that: "The best time to make money is when blood is running in the streets." Thus, to the evil cabal of Black Adepts, the Brotherhood of Darkness, who masqueraded as international businessmen and bankers, wars are not merely means to make vast fortunes, by lending at exorbitant interest to both sides and by marketing the instruments of war, but also to consolidate power by eliminating historic spiritual enemies. This dark cabal of Evil, the Dark Masters, the Brotherhood of Darkness, are occult adepts who use Black Magic to control leaders and people of any influence. They do this by corrupting them in the secret societies they control and to which the vast majority of society's "great and good" belong, such as Freemasonry, and making him their puppets, wittingly or unwittingly, in their quest for world domination. The Black Adepts have used their dark magic throughout history to wrest control of the world from forces they despise and hold in great contempt and thus wars, and rumours of wars, is the great mechanism to do this. Modern wars, since at least the French Revolution, are fought not to defeat an enemy but to bring about the crises and chaos whereby the Dark Masters can change society. Napoleon, Kaiser Wilhelm, Hitler, Emperor Hirohito, John F Kennedy, Saddam Hussein and numerous others are the pawns in the Great Game who are moved by sinister hidden forces to bring about the conditions for wars and rumours of wars. The baton of Evil was passed to the Illuminati by this ancient Brotherhood of Darkness that both created it and bequeathed it the tenets of Organised Evil formed by Abdullah ibn Maymn and refined by the sect of Hasan-e Sabbah. The structure and ethos of the Assassins became the ultimate model on which all systems of organised murder working through fanaticism, such as the Carbonari, the Mafia and the Irish Republican Brotherhood. Whilst the signs, symbols, and initiations, of the Grand Lodge of Cairo formed the basis for the great secret societies of Europe. It is often said, with the definite purpose of demonising them, that the Knights Templars were the spiritual heirs of theOccult Conspiracy against God. On the contrary, they were diametrically opposed to the aims of theBrotherhood of Darkness and worked to bring a modern European civilisation into existence predicated on the Christ Impulse that was released from the Cross at Calvary. The Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon worked to thwart the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government and therefore they were enemies of those who worked for theOverlords of Chaos seeking to subvert Christendom In short, Knights Templars were the spiritual enemies of Dark Gods. Hence, the Knights Templars are therefore the spiritual enemies of the Black Adepts of the Cult of Evil and the subsequent calumnies heaped on the Order's reputation, and its successful demonisation of it, is proof-positive of the temporal power that the Cult of Evil has in this world. The function of occult groups since their inception in very early times is twofold: esoteric and political. The character of the secret society and hence its activities is dependant upon which aspect it promotes. If it concerns itself with the esoteric then its influence on society is by necessity limited. However, when the political is promoted above the esoteric then the group's influence upon society can be disproportionate to its size. Moreover, when the occult group is Satanic or Luciferian its influence can be terrible. The common thread running through most of these groups is the existence of Evil Principalities that orchestrate these human agents, directing them to ends using whatever means are available. This is the Great Conspiracy. And gentle reader, understand, the Great Conspiracy is not merely an attempt to create a tyrannicalNew World Order (Novus Ordo Seclorum) it is very much more ambitious than that. It is nothing less than a conspiracy against God and Nature. It is a spiritual battle to wrest control of Creation from its maker and take it into realms of unimagined iniquity. Humanity is the field of conflict on which this spiritual battle is being fought, which is manifest in the spiritual, cultural, political, and economic spheres. The contest on Earth is about the CONTROL of humanity from the cradle to the grave and beyond. The Dark Gods desire to cut mankind off from the source of his being and to blind him to the spiritual hierarchies that are the origin of life on Earth. Then, spiritually blind, mankind would be trapped in the physical realm oblivious to the spirit within, and when he died would enter the higher realms blinded and ignorant of his true spiritual inheritance. He would also be ignorant of God. Modern cults that covertly pursued political ambitions were the medieval Muslim cults; the laterIsmailis, the Fatimites, the Karmathites and their occident spawn the Illuminati. Linking the two expressions of Evil is the stream of consciousness that was orchestrated by the Dark Gods, theOverlords of Chaos called Satan and Lucifer. Satanic cults and occult groups infiltrated by the agents of Evil have sprung up and in their various ways have worked to bring the Ahrimanic deception to fruition. European history is replete with evidence of the activities of these groups and certain notorious individuals that revealed themselves for what they were. A subtle stratagem used by theOverlords of Chaos is to convince the world that they do not exist. This is done by acts of deception and illusion that confuse normal intelligence. That is why they have tried to control the human conception and comprehension of the Truth. This is why the agents of Evil have seized control of History by seizing knowledge of it and, consequently, have smothered Objective Reality in a cloak of deceit and obscured it behind a smokescreen of half-truths and lies. This perversion ofObjective Reality by vested interests moved Voltaire to assert that: "All our ancient history… is no more than accepted fiction." Accepted that is by the unwitting masses not the Power Elite who know the truth of the matter. John Ruskin (1819-1900), the Oxford professor and mentor to Cecil Rhodes (1853-1902) described it thus: "That treacherous phantom which men call history." Henry Ford (1863-1947), a parvenu member of the elite, put the case in more prosaic terms when he declared that: "History is more or less bunk." With regard to the subject of Satanism, the love of Evil for the sake of Evil or Black Magic, the object of the Evil Agenda is to ridicule the idea of it by encouraging claims of amazing extravagance. By promoting the Humanist and Liberal Agendas predicated on the materialistic tenets of the Enlightenment, the Dark Gods, the Overlords of Chaos, desire to hide their activities by cultivating the faculty of scepticism and the arrogance of intellect within modern consciousness. By this means, modern man has been inculcated with the idea that the celestial hierarchy is a chimera, an atavistic relic from our superstitious ancestors. Moreover, the notion of Black Magic has been so subverted that modern sensibilities regard it as product of medieval superstition, and those who condemn it are deemed as deceived as those who practice it. This is a view not held by the elite that controls the world. They are very aware of the existence of the spirit realms for they worship the Evil gods that inhabit them. The cabal of power that control society, the human power-brokers of the world, are disciples of the Dark Gods, the Overlords of Chaos. Thus, at the beginning of the fourteenth century, as western civilisation entered a new phase of its evolution, called materialism, a new menace appeared within the occult milieu of Europe: the Cult of Satanism. The phenomenon was not a product of hysterical imagination but a reality. For, as man sunk ever deeper into materialism and his spiritual myopia increased another Dark God moved to corrupt humanity still further. This is the great demon often referred to in the Bible as Satan. A spirit of immense power who was known to all men and all cultures by different names and who the ancient Aryans called Angra Mainyu. The ancient initiates. of whom Zarathustra was the most revered, perceived him as the great god of darkness, the eternal destroyer of good, personification and creator of evil, bringer of death and disease. He is also known as Ahriman, a name that means"fiendish spirit." He is, of course, the "great adversary" of God.
In the Luciferian and Satanist worldview the existence of the One True God is a sine qua non:Without the Creator God their raison d'être would be made void. In short, God could exist without the Luciferians and Satanists, but the Luciferian and Satanist could not exist without God. Thus, theidea of the Devil is rendered obsolete if the concept of God is denied, for the Devil is the Arch-rebel against Creation. What is the point of spitting at the cross if it offends no one? Renegades need a target: one cannot commit an outrage if there is no one to outrage. In the case of evil and wicked people, it is the presence of God alone that makes their mischief valid. It is because the"Devil" is not God that Black Magic exists. Satanists are sad people. They are filled with bile and bitterness, who have tasted wormwood and gall, who in their desperation turn to the Devil for solace. They ask for vengeance against the world that has rejected them and against their perceived enemies. They beseech him to overturn the natural order of things and give them satisfaction at last. Whatever price is asked, it will seem a bargain to these sad and bitter wretches. People who have lapsed from their religion will turn to their God in times of crises: those who suffered unjustly while believers will often turn against their God and try and betray him. On a mundane level, Devil worshippers are akin to naughty boys spitting at their mothers and scribbling across their father's football pools! They are pathetic and petty vandals seeking vengeance for their powerlessness and social impoverishment. The immaturity of the individuals that call themselves Satanists is evident. They have a childlike attachment to unwholesome heroes and instead of maturing onto more salubrious heroes they are stuck on power obsessed idols. Wicked people stumble through life but the worst of them have lost touch with reality, for, it has slipped through their fingers. They cling to juvenile dreams of power and think they can reduce Creation to chaos again. Like the Mafia, practitioners of Black Magic yearn for power but hate to serve it. Satanism is at best a nuisance and a vexation but ultimately an immature calling. It is a pastime for losers and louts. Satanism only becomes dangerous to the rest of humanity to an infinite degree when it is mixed with POLITICS… as, unfortunately, it very often is. The Cult of Evil has existed since very early times. Evil and wicked people have invoked the powers of darkness since the earliest days of the human race hoping to bring about the revolt against Heaven from Earth. It is a demonically incited conspiracy that transcends time and generations and is possessed of a genius that only true Evil can inspire. This is the Great Conspiracy that is the revolt against God and Nature. It is intergenerational, with the diabolic agenda passed from one generation to another who then attempt to further the aims of the Great Conspiracy fashioned by the Dark Gods, the Overlords of Chaos. The essence of Satanism is desecration. The Satanist empowers himself by profaning the ceremonies of the religion he formerly belonged to and by trampling its holiest symbols under foot. The Satanist also raises power by desecrating the memory of the dead, of sacred memories and observances, and the sodomising of boys and deflowering young virgins. However, the most potent means of raising demonic power is the blood sacrifice of humans. That is why the Occult Hierarchy, the Secret Masters of the dark Empire of Secret Societies who are the true Lords of Power on Earth are also the Spiritual Dark Lords of Blood and Sexual Sacrifice.  In the early modern period a man emerged to reveal himself as one possessed of Evil and whose biography illustrates the incursion of an ancient Evil into the modern world. He wasGilles de Rais (1404-40) a Breton baron, marshal of France, and man of wealth whose distinguished career ended in a celebrated trial for Satanism, abduction, and child murder. His name is now associated with the story of Bluebeard, the monster of Charles Perrault's tale of Barbe Bleue, who murdered his wives and hid their bodies in a locked room. His early life was glorious. He was the companion and guide of Jeanne d'Arc; he became a marshal of France and distinguished himself by many deeds of valour. However, after frittering his immense inherited wealth he was led to study alchemy, partly by curiosity and partly as a means for restoring his ravaged fortunes. The eventual corruption of this medieval personality, from Christian mystic to devout Satanist, is a salient example that illustrates the rise of the influence of Ahriman upon modern man. Following the death of the Maid of Orleans, Rais slipped into depravity and eventually offering himself to thePowers of Darkness.The reason for his spiritual corruption appears to be an insatiable desire to gain knowledge, power and riches and to do so by invoking the Devil. Soon, Satanists flocked to him offering their services and the quick fix that would restore his fortunes. The desired results were not forthcoming so the increasingly desperate noble sunk ever deeper into the moral and spiritual corruption that would eventually procure for him the infamy for which his name has remained synonymous. The satanic rituals he orchestrated became increasingly more horrific as he and his cohorts became evermore possessed of the spirit of Ahriman. Perverted vice in every form, wicked debaucheries and human sacrifices held sway in these demonic rituals. Hundreds of children disappeared from the hinterland surrounding his castle as Rais and his agents kidnapped these unfortunates for use in grotesque tortures and blood sacrifices to the Dark Gods. Eventually he was accused of having abducted, tortured, and murdered more than 140 children and was condemned for heresy by the ecclesiastical court and sentenced to death for murder by the civil court. Thus in 1440 the satanically possessed nobleman was hanged and then burnt. Criminality per se is not the reason for the behaviour of Rais, for, he acted in unison with a coterie of kindred souls that also worshipped the Dark Gods. It was only after his invocation of the Evil Onethat he developed the terrible sadistic personality that sneered at normal society and spat in the face of God. The youthful Rais was not the mature Rais. Something had happened to sour the soul of this once devout Christian warrior: he allowed himself to be possessed of demons that guided him to his moral and spiritual ruin. Rais was also a spectacular example of the contemporary occult scene in Europe. For, he was a keen student of the Jewish Kabbalah (also spelled Kabala, Cabala, Cabbala, Cabbalah Qabala, Qabbala, Qabalah or Qabbalah), an occult system sweeping through the Secret Societies of Western Europe and vying with alchemy for occult ascendancy. By the fifteenth century the Jews had become a power in many parts of Europe. They had penetrated into the intellectual circles and many royal and noble courts of Spain, Portugal, Provence and Italy. Some brought with them a peculiar esoteric mysticism, the Kabbalah that laid claim to a secret knowledge of the unwritten Torah (Divine Revelation) that was allegedly communicated by God to Moses and Adam. The Kabbalah claimed to provide a means of directly approaching God. However, the mystical system tended to detract from the monotheism of Orthodox Judaism by introducing dangerously pantheistic and heretical elements. Thus, amongst devout Jews the Kabbalah was considered dangerous material. It also contained occult wisdom that dealt with baleful subject matter that caused some to call the Kabbalah "that science of demoniacal arts." |
|
| |||
"For the love of money is the root of all evil" (2 Tim. 6:10)  The traitors within World Jewry working to betray the whole world to the Dark Gods they worship use two powerful weapons. First, "international finance," or more accurately,International Usury; second, the Zionist Movement, which is the Jewish shibboleth of the"Chosen People" politicised.That "the Jews" are now the Elite Mammonites was only made possible by the destruction of the great impediment of the Knights Templars who were verily the first international bankers. If the Knights Templars endured there would be no need of the "court Jew" and his bulging purse and so the rise of "the Jews" would have been severely curtailed. This could not happen since theConfederacy of Evil had plans for the rancorous, scheming Jew. Thus, the Dark Gods moved to remove the great impediment and so contrived to destroyed the first international bankers, the Knights Templars. The spiritual warriors who were the guardians of theChrist Impulse and who had worked to create a modern civilisation in Europe based on the spirituality released from the Cross at Cavalry. And in this they largely succeeded and Western Christian Civilisation became established. The Dark Forces opposed the spiritual inspiration of Templars and the designs that it had for the evolution of European civilisation using the Templar Order as its tool. The Dark Gods worked diligently to extinguish the impulse that was moulding the social architecture of the emerging European nation states. They gained a victory when they inspired Philip le Bel to remove theTemplars from the Great Game and cause their carefully crafted banking system to be destroyed. The Jew moneylender came into his own following the Templars' destruction, for, the Jews greedily made themselves the pre-eminent moneychangers of Europe in their stead. The Power of the Purse was well known to the secret masters of Jewry who practised it for centuries before the demise of the Templars. Warner Sombart in his book Les Juifs et la vie economique is helpful on this point:
"And they come to Jerusalem: and Jesus went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves" Mark 11:15 "And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise." John 2:15-16 The rise of the Jew as the pre-eminent moneylender is a salient example of the growing corruption ensnaring the world. A phenomenon numerous people have commented upon. Money changing and lending is an ancient practice that the Jew has made his own, his forte so to speak. The beginnings of this trade were in the post-Exodus period when the law was passed requiring every male Israelite from twenty years and upwards to pay into the treasury of the sanctuary a half a shekel every year as an offering to Jehovah (Exod. 30:13-15). The Jews coming to the feasts from all parts of the world were therefore obliged to exchange the various coins in common circulation for this Jewish piece. There arose a class of men, who frequented the temple courts, who offered to who exacted a premium for the exchange of foreign coins. These were the moneychangers who exacted a premium for the exchange and whose trade became a very lucrative one, since the exchangers exacted whatever fee they might. The profession of moneychanger in Palestine was thus brought about because of the levying of a religious tax on the people by the priesthood. Christ showed anger only once in the Gospels and that was when He came into Jerusalem and went into the temple and found the moneychangers their, conducting their sinful trade in the House of the Lord (Matt. 21:12; Mark 11:15; John 2:15). Christ's righteous anger was not only because of the greed and impiety of these men. Nor was it that they conducted their trade dishonestly or that they obtruded a secular business within the house of prayer. The main reason for the great anger was that Christ understood completely, as only God could, the future role usury would play in the unfolding drama of the Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government. For, Christ new of the future corruption of "the Jews," of the Jewish people, because of their love of Mammon and the crucial part Usury would play in the enslavement of the world and, moreover, with Jewry as its greatest exponent. The Profaners of the Temple were the forbears of the Profaners of the Christ Impulse and Usury andRevolution would be their two greatest weapons. Christ's anger against the moneychangers was great indeed. By pouring out the money onto the ground, He showed His utter contempt of it and by overthrowing the tables of the moneychangers He showed is great displeasure of those that make worldly profit out of religion. He then drove them all out of the Temple and so by throwing out the money, overturning the tables, He threw out the wicked trade too. Significantly, He did not complain to the chief priests about the corruptions in the Temple, which it was their sacred duty to safeguard; for, He knew they countenanced those corruptions. That the traffickers and Moneychangers were allowed free reign in the temple was scandal enough but the condoning of it by the priesthood was betrayal of the cruellest kind. The presence of these wordily profiteers was symbolic of the degradation of the priesthood and evidence of the hold the Cult of Evil had by then on the high priests of The Temple and the Sanhedrin. It was thus a combination of these three things that aroused Christ to such anger. The fact of desecration of the Temple by usurers: The fact that the priesthood was controlled by the Cult of Evil: And, the understanding of the future role of usury, but especially Jewish Usury in the Evil Agenda to enslave mankind.
Not all Jews are international financiers and not all international financiers are Jews. However, the uniqueness of Jewry, its religious and racial integrity spread out over continents and generations and the endemic sense of racial superiority, has nurtured the skills, wherewithal and inclination to prevail over the goyim. Thus, the Modern Tribe of Jews has thrown up usurers of astonishing skill and invention. The stratagems of the Two Dark Gods are ingenious, subtle and unfold over many generations. The skills and reputation of "the Jews" regarding finance have been gained from many centuries of effort. The Dark Gods required a means whereby humanity was continually in bondage and easily controlled by a cadre of evil whenever they required it. That is why the phenomenon of usury was nurtured such that the finances of the private individual and the purse of the king could be plundered at will. Moreover, the conspirators targeted the finances of kings, states and nations: for, they knew that they who controlled the credit of a nation controlled that nation. Thus, the Jew moneylender developed the skills necessary that would make himself, or rather his bulging purse, useful to profligate princes and kings. Thus the phenomenon of the "court Jew" who had wheedled themselves into the noble houses and royal courts of Europe. However, it was not philanthropy or "self-preservation" that drove these men but another more long-term agenda: the eventual bondage of the nobleman and king and hence the holding in Jewish hands the mortgage of Gentile feudal lands. This, then, was the great prize. But, the rise of the Power of the Jewish Purse brought with it, for "the Jews" anyway, an unintended consequence. That, as "the Jews" grew fat of the Gentile and the Gentile became both increasingly impoverished and alarmed at the exclusiveness of Jewry, Gentile resentment morphed into violent reaction. The sudden realisation that the enrichment and empowerment of "the Jews"was to the detriment of the gentile and his nation. The time when the indigenous people insisted that "the Jews" should be removed from their lands. Thus, the historical phenomenon of the mass expulsion of "the Jews" from Gentile lands. Moreover, the metamorphosis of the wandering, alien Jew settling in Gentile lands, an unwelcome guest who becomes a convenient resource then trusted adviser then betrayer of the nation. This is the reason why "the Jews" were expelled from all states that they settled. The common historical theme of mass expulsion was not a product of xenophobia or racism. What can be seen in thisrecurring theme is the sudden realisation of the host people that their best interests were threatened by the continued presence of the Jew in their country. The best interests of the people were founded on freedom from bondage to usurers, especially the nobles and kings. "The Jews" have dominated the banking industry for more than one thousand years because of the Church'sl interpretations regarding the lending of money at interest and the destruction of the Knights Templars by the Confederacy of Evil. This was as intended by the Dark Gods, Ahrimanand Lucifer who have cultivated and corrupted the unique status of the Jew, to use the Jew as an integral instrument in the furtherance of their agenda of enslavement of humanity. The immorality of usury was well known to the Hebrews but the strict moral sanction was slowly attenuated by successive generations of Judaeans who were inexorably submerged in the Ahrimanic spirituality that drew them ever further away from Yahweh and ultimately set them in opposition to Christ, by which time they were called " the Jews." The Jewish theologian Moses Maimonides (1135-1204), who codified Jewish law in the Talmud, said this on the matter: "why is [usury] called nesek [biting]? Because he who takes it bites his fellow, causes pain to him, and eats his flesh." Usury was repeatedly proscribed in the Old Testament. It was also given similar treatment in theKoran, the sacred writings of Islam revealed by Allah to the prophet Mohammed, which also expressly prohibit lending money at "interest." However, the Evil Agenda required Jewry as its mechanism by which to impoverish kings and nations and thus the Talmudic mindset that gripped the Jewish soul soon managed to erect sophistical arguments to nullify the Word of God. The Talmud imbued Jewish mind conjured up a double moral standard with regards to usury: one morality that accepted the wickedness of usury when applied to their own race; and the other morality, which when applied to non-Jews, the gentiles, had it that usury was very acceptable. The Jewish sophists used the verse from Deuteronomy to justify the practice of usury upon a stranger but not of a brother (23:20)."Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it" (Deut. 23:20). This obviously begs the question who is a brother and who is a stranger? In the wicked Talmudteachings, "brother" means "Jew," while "stranger" is anyone else. Ambrose (339-397), the bishop of Milan and one of the most illustrious Church Fathers and Doctors of the Church, whose works greatly influenced the scholastics, "considered lending to a stranger a legitimate hostile act against an enemy." Thomas Aquinas (1225-74), the greatest of the scholastics, Philosopher, theologian, doctor of the Church (Angelicus Doctor), patron of Catholic universities,colleges, and schools said this about the problem of usury and the Deutoronomic double standard practised by Jews:  "The Jews were forbidden to take usury from their brethren, that is, from other Jews. By this we are given to understand that to take usury from another man is simply evil, because we ought to treat every man as our neighbour and brother..." Even "the Jews" that converted to Christianity were violent critics of the Usurious Jews. For instance, the convert, Johannes Pffeferkorn, argued that profits from usury was the main reason that Jews remained Jews, since they were reluctant to become Christians and do "honest work."Another, Anton Margaritha, argued that such "honest work by Jews would humble them." Conversely, as Abram Leon states, the Jewish "monopoly of usury brought them such wealth that some Christians undoubtedly went over to Judaism in order to participate in the Jewish monopoly in lending." The key to understanding the duplicity of the Jewish mind and the ease at which it can rationalise an enduring irrational hate of non-Jews is the religion of the modern Jew, the majority of them, and his "holy book": that is, Pharisaism (Judaism) and the Talmud. The Pharisaic Religion concretised in the Talmud is inimical to Christianity and therefore to God and violates the moral laws arising from Them. The Talmud is a practical manual for the despoliation of the world and its non-Jewish communities framed in religious language but whose wellspring is not the God of the Bible. For, theTalmud is the product of a long process of the corruption of the Yahweh religion that had begun in the seventh century before the Incarnation of Christ. Furthermore, this anti-Yahweh and anti-Christ religion was the art and practice of the Pharisee, Sadducee and Scribe. The spirituality that energised the minds of the authors of the Talmud was not only inimical to the Christ Impulse but its opposite and mortal enemy on Earth. Therefore, understanding the Pharisee mindset is by contrast an aid toward understanding the spirit of uncorrupted Christianity, which is the Apostolic Christianity that contained the purity of Christ's message. While Christ's message attempted to call men to the Law of God itself as the supreme guide of life, the Pharisees corrupted the Yahweh religion making it a vehicle for Evil. That is, they corrupted Yahwehism into Pharisaism, which is today is called Judaism. Heinrich Graetz (1817–91) who was a Jewish bigot who believed that Judaism (Pharisaism) was, after"the Jews" at least, the superlative manifestation in Creation tells us that:
The "isolated instances of uncharitable judgements and decrees against the members of other nations and religions," described by Professor Graetz are a recurring theme running throughout Talmudic thought. It is also indicative of hatred and arrogance that is the root cause of the modern"Jewish Problem" as it is also the spirituality behind the sophistical arguments justifying usury.Werner Sombart (1863-1941) the German economist studied the phenomenon of modern capitalism and the relation between "the Jews" and modern capitalism. Sombart published his findings in The Jews and Modern Capitalism. Sombart tells us of the profane nature of Talmudism: "The principal characteristic of the Jewish religion consists in its being alien to the Hereafter, a religion, as it were, solely and essentially worldly." That is, Jewish theology has been deliberately moulded to suit the worldly ambitions of Jewry, but especially its hidden masters the Black Adepts of the Kabbalah -the High Priests of the Luciferian Creed- who serve the Dark Gods, Ahriman and Lucifer. The pristine nature of the Torah, that was the inspiration for the Talmud, has been corrupted by successive generations of rabbis who have collectively worked to remove the imperatives of Yahweh from it and fashion an alternative theology based on precepts inimical to both Yahweh and Christ, but especially towards Christ. Mohammed (570-632), the Arab prophet who founded Islam also perceived this corruption:  "Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belong to them, becomes one of them, God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered from divine religion. You must not relent in your work which must show up Jewish deceit." The move to create a worldly Jewish religion, Pharisaism and its "holy book," the Talmud, with very definite utilitarian precepts occurred long ago. When men took it upon themselves to put words in the mouth of God and to present themselves as supremely gifted interpreters of what was "really"in God's Mind. It was a long-term strategy of the Dark Gods to turn the Tribe of Judah, (theJudahites) once the vehicle of the greatest good by providing the perfect human vessel for theIncarnation of Christ, into the vehicle of the greatest Evil. Or rather, by nurturing a people who would filching the good name, reputation of Judah and his Yahweh Promises. Thereby, bringing about the situation whereby the Evil Agenda is transmitted through the historical process and across continents with consummate ease by a tribe of people calling themselves "the Jews." The Modern Tribe of Jews that has made itself a consummate vehicle of Evil because of the secret and enduring rancour of the Jew for the Gentile, his nation and his God. The Talmudic commentary on the Hebrew Bible is the supreme law of contemporary Jewry and not the Torah or the rest of the Hebrew Bible. That is why the Talmud College, the yeshiva and their scholars hold such a prominent place in the Jewish community. Thus, the Jewish Chronicle (March 26, 1993) published in Britain states that in the yeshiva, Jews are "devoted to the Talmud to the exclusion of everything else." The Pharisaic doctrine that the commandments of rabbis and not theWord of God should prevail in Jewish society is at the root of the Talmudic creed. But it is a creed and commentary that Jesus Christ denounced as voiding the Laws of God and not upholding them. The Talmud had not yet been written down in Christ's time but he condemned the traditions of theMishnah (the early manifestation of the Talmud) and those who taught it (the Scribes and Pharisees), because it effectively quashed Biblical teachings. Moreover, rabbis in the centuries that followed the Crucifixion, formulated doctrines that were inimical to Christ, His Mission and His function in Creation and infixed them in the Talmud. The double standard ethic is endemic in Talmudic teachings. Thus, when medieval Christendom welcomed Jewish converts believing that they shared a common belief, a sort of "Judaeo-Christian"heritage, the indigenous peoples were soon disabused of this. For, the rancorous Jew soon let his feelings become known by his outward behaviour towards his Gentile neighbour. For, most Jews, believing themselves to be the elite of all tribes and that they were also "God's Chosen People," chose separateness and scorn as the response to Gentile goodwill. Moreover, they pushed for preferment in all things, especially in self-regulation of their communities. In many places they were even permitted Talmudic self-governance by Christian authorities, only being called to the greater laws of the state for extraordinary crimes. Consequently, within the segregated communities, a favourable environment was fostered whereby "the Jews" could enact double standard, self-serving laws to the detriment of the Gentile lawmakers and citizens. A situation that progressively isolated the Jewish communities and brought upon "the Jews" increasing Gentile enmity. A situation described by several modern Jewish intellectuals such as Jacob Katz, who suggests that: "The belief that Jewish law was of divine origin, whereas Gentile law was purely a human invention, linked any evaluation with the most fundamental theological tenet of Judaism. The moral conduct of the Jew towards Gentiles, if it was not to be determined solely by expediency and prudence, could have been influenced only by principles derived exclusively from Jewish sources." Another Jewish intellectual, Ehud Sprinzak, describes the traditional Jewish perspective on the surrounding Gentile "law of the land" in Eastern Europe thus: "Everyone knew everybody in the [Jewish community], and there was no need for official code or written law. The only formal law was the Torah and its halakhic interpretation as understood by the local rabbi ... It was a basis communal conduct ...['You help me, and I'll you'] ... The attitude towards the formal law of the land was suspicion... One has to survive it, not respect it. The art of Jewish survival within the ghetto included an elaborate system of using, avoiding, and sidestepping the [Gentile] law." Yet another, James Yaffe, describes it thus: "The feeling of separation ... leads to a special Orthodox morality. Ultimately because the moral value of every act is determined by halakhah, by Jewish law, they develop a rather cavalier attitude toward 'gentile' law. For example, a tiny minority of Hasidim [in America today] engage in jewelry smuggling. In the shtetl [Jewish Eastern European village] this was a traditional trade. Nobody looked upon it as a crime, because nobody recognized the existence of national borders; the only borders that mattered were those that divided the Jewish from the Gentile world." The wilful, self-imposed isolation of "the Jews," their insistence upon insular self-governance, and the speaking of Yiddish or Hebrew and the practice of Talmudic religion combined to set them apart from their Gentile neighbour. And so, to set their face continually against their host. This was exacerbated by the Jewish belief in themselves as a race apart, who would not assimilate, who believed themselves a race within a race, and who worked to bring about the Jewish Messianic Kingdom on Earth. Thus, the historical phenomenon of the rancorous Jew. The rancorous Jew who plotted and schemed to bring about self-enrichment at the expense of the Gentile but who, in the process, thought he furthered the cause of World Jewry and its One World Ambition and thus, somehow, does the "will of god." Mutual hostility arose between the Christians and "the Jews" who were separated by a huge spiritual gulf and whose only significant intercourse between them was commerce. A field in which "the Jews," despite their small numbers, were rapidly becoming pre-eminent. Especially by creating amongst themselves and the disparate communities of the so-called "Diaspora" the transcontinental network of contacts that greatly facilitated trade and commerce. Nevertheless, more importantly, they were also beginning to perfect and make grand the hated Usury that would soon ensnare kings, nobles, subjects and entire nations. Hebrew and Yiddish were languages that were impenetrable to most Gentiles and for centuries, rabbinical dictate forbade the teaching of Hebrew to Gentiles. The use of these strange "secret"languages tended to heighten Gentile suspicions of "the Jews." The seemingly glorious isolation of the Jew in his community, insulated from the Gentile, his laws and his God promoted the double standard mentality, whereby the ethical treatment of Jews by Jews was very different than that meted out by "the Jews" to the Gentiles. Jacob Katz describes it thus: "No moral teaching could change the realities of religious rivalry, social segregation, and the plurality of legal systems. All these must have encouraged a double standard of behavior. Those who were reluctant to be guided by the higher morality had the letter of the law on their side." "The letter of the law" is, of course, the wicked human construct called the Talmud and other attendant Jewish teachings, which Katz wrote, "are far from forming the elements of a universalistic ethic. They took social duality for granted." This is a less honest way of saying that Jews routinely interpreted the Talmud and its attendant teachings to sanction the exploitation of gentiles. Max Weber (1864-1920) the Gentile German sociologist and pioneer of the analytic method in sociology wrote this on the point of Jewish bigotry in business and their use of sharp practice in dealings with the gentile: "The economic behaviour of the Jew simply moved in the direction of the least resistance which was permitted them by [their] legalistic ethical norms. This means in practice that the acquisitive drive, which is found in varying degrees in all groups and nations, was here directed primarily to trade with strangers [i.e., non-Jews], who were usually regarded as enemies." The Jewish writer Bernard Weinryb describes the situation in medieval Poland: "... the limitations upon non-Jews [by Jewish law and culture] were ... stringent. Being outsiders in the Jewish community they were subject to all the prescriptions applying to foreigners. Thus Jewish middlemen and agents were forbidden to put one non-Jewish businessman in contact with another or to bring a non-Jewish consumer into a non-Jewish store. Many warnings were issued to such agents against showing non-Jews 'how to do business' or divulging Jewish business secrets to him ... Jews were forbidden to rent a room to a non-Jew ... Another area controlled by the Jewish community was rents and leaseholds. In time ... monopolistic tendencies increased among the Jews ... The fact remained that the monopolistic-exclusion principles were also an integral part of the Jewish way of life and could thus not be regarded as a constant anti-Semitic factor directly solely against themselves." Eva Hoffman, another modern Jewish scholar, writes of the Jew in Poland: "... that the Jews had their views of the people among whom they lived we cannot doubt, but their ordinary opinions, ideas, and preconceptions are largely inaccessible to us, since almost no secular Jewish literature is extant for the early period. We do know, however, that Jews had their exclusionism and monopolistic practices, prohibiting rights of residence to outsiders in their quarters, and strictly guarded certain business practices and 'secrets' from non-Jews ... We can take it for granted, moreover, that fierce religious disapproval traveled both ways [between Jews and Poles] ... At the same time, unlike other minority groups, Jews had no wish to assimilate, to take on the coloring of the surrounding culture, to become like the other." Heinrich Graetz usually referred to as the foremost Jewish historian of modern times, has this to say on the Jews of Poland and their regard for their hosts:
The Jacob-Esau tradition is often used as a metaphor for the skulduggery of the Jew in his dealings with the Gentile, whereby Jacob, the Jewish cheater and deceiver, is lionised in the Jewish tradition. Israeli professor Jay Goren writes: "As we may recall, Jacob the tent dweller, who used his head, outsmarted Esau, the skilled hunter, who uses his hands, and cheated Esau out of his inheritance, Isaac's blessing. The blessing was the birthright of Esau by virtue of his being the firstborn child. In Jewish tradition, Jacob came to symbolize the Jews and Esau the Gentiles. Thus, an image of contrasting roles were formed whereby the Jews were supposed to use their heads and the Gentiles their muscles." Another Israeli author, Israel Shahak argued that Orthodox Judaism is by its very nature: "... a combination of hypocrisy and the profit motive [of] duplicity and venality … It is actually true that the Jewish religious establishment does have a strong tendency to chicanery and graft due to the corrupting influence of the Orthodox Jewish religion." The influential German idealist philosopher, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), merely reiterates so many other commentators on the Jewish community and its relations with the gentile:
The French Jewish socialist and Zionist, Bernard Lazare, put the case for the special treachery of the Jew thus:
Ashkenazi Jews of course brought this ethic to Britain, to America, to Canada, to Australia, to South Africa, in fact, everywhere the "Diaspora" landed, especially on the coattails of the British during their empire building. For instance, as Jewish commentator James Yaffe notes: "The Lower East Side [the turn-of-the-century Jewish section of Manhattan] pushcart peddler who prided himself on his honesty wouldn't hesitate to sell damaged goods to the Gentile housewife." Similarly, we find this duplicity in the autobiography of Mary Antin, a Jewish immigrant to the United States from Russia, called The Promised Land in which she observed that: "[Jewish merchants and money lenders] preyed upon [Christians], and our shopkeepers gave false measure. People who want to defend the Jews ought never to deny this. Yes, I say, we cheated the Gentiles whenever we dared, because it was the only thing to do ... Is not that the code of war? Encamped in the midst of the enemy, we could practice no other. A Jew could hardly exist in business unless he developed a dual conscience, which allowed him to do to the Gentile what he would call a sin against a fellow Jew." Max Weber, the German sociologist, termed this historic Jewish quality, this duplicity, as "the dualistic nature of [Judaism's] in-group and out-group moralities." Modern Jewish apologists attempt to deny that the ancient enmity and secret rancour of the Jew for the Gentile exists and attempt to defend the indefensible. Especially the copious examples of the traditional Jewish double standard of morality. For example, the attempt by Jules Carlebach to equate Jewish outrages with the actions of autonomous states, notwithstanding the fact that the Jew, wherever he may have been, was a subject of a sovereign nation with its own laws. "If an independent political state adopted legislation which is intended to further the interests of its citizens, but which has no parallel provisions in neighboring states, then it is both logical and essential to create a dual system." Throughout history the growing menace of Jewish usury was perceived by men who understood instinctively the threat it posed to the future wellbeing of Western Christian Civilisation. Our ancestors soon understood the menace of Jew usury as an instrument of control within their nation. For instance, the "Magna Carta" signed at Runnymede in 1215 by King John under duress from his barons specifically addresses this problem. The main grievance redressed by the Magna Carta was the king's policy of extortionate taxation and financial plunder of his subjects. It also addressed the free Englishman's rights to trial by jury, Habeas Corpus, no arbitrary search and seizure, and equality before the law. Articles ten and eleven of the Charter addressed usury and gave protection against foreclosure by ruthless usurers: "10. If one who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, die before that loan be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest while the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt fall into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal sum contained in the bond. 11. And if anyone die indebted to the Jews, his wife shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if any children of the deceased are left under age, necessaries shall be provided for them in keeping with the holding of the deceased; and out of the residue the debt shall be paid, reserving, however, service due to feudal lords; in like manner let it be done touching debts due to others than Jews." The authors of the Magna Carta were acutely aware of the threat of Jewish usury to the wellbeing of their nation. Hence, as the subsequent centuries slipped by it came to pass that banking and usury became synonymous with Jewry. And that is exactly what the subtle Evil genius behind the Great Conspiracy desired: the Jewish race was to be the vehicle whereby nations became enslaved by usurers that owed allegiance, not to their host nation, but to the Dark Gods who are Lucifer and Ahriman(Satan). Thus the Jewish race (the ordinary members of it) are the unwitting pawns of the Great Conspiracy, repeatedly betrayed by their elite to the Evil Principalities that are ruled by the Dark Gods who are Lucifer and Ahriman (Satan). The creeping menace of Jewish usury to the wellbeing of the Gentile nations has been highlighted by numerous commentators: not out of malice or mischief, but simply because it is true. Here is a sample of an inexhaustible supply of writings and comments on the phenomenon of the menace of Jewish usury to the Gentile and his nation. Diodorus Siculus, the first century BC Greek historian who lived in the times of Julius Caesar and Augustus, had this to say on the point of usury and its use by the Jews: "Usury" is the practice of lending money at excessive interest rates. This has for centuries caused great misery and poverty for Gentiles. It has brought strong condemnation of the Jews!"  Thomas Aquinas, the 13th century scholastic philosopher in his On the Governance of the Jews he wrote:"The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious." The great German theologian Martin Luther (1483-1546), who led the Reformation, is quoted inTable Talk of Martin Luther as saying this:
Pope Clement VIII (1693-1769) lamented that: "All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor. Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever country they happen to live." Francois-Marie Arouet, better known as Voltaire (1694-1778), the French writer who was the embodiment of 18th century Enlightenment wrote that:  "They [Jews] are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race." (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771). Rulers where not unknowing of the growing menace within their kingdoms: Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), the Corsican who became Emperor of the French, stated in Reflections and Speechesbefore the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806, that the Jews are:  "... the carrion birds of humanity ... are a state within a state. They are certainly not real citizens ... The evils of Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of these people." Maria Theresa (1771 - 89), Queen of Hungary and Bohemia, understood the rancour and discord emanating from the Jew: "Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible." Nicholas I (1796-1855), Czar of Russia, understood the creeping menace of Jewish usury in his realm and the attendant impoverishment of his people. In his diaries we find that: "The ruin of the peasants in these provinces are the Zhids ['Yids', 'Kikes']. They are full- fledged leeches sucking up these unfortunate provinces to the point of exhaustion." In a book called Adam and Cain by William N. Murray, former Governor of Oklahoma (1951), theShadow Government of America, the Anglo-American establishment whose exoteric expression is the Council on Foreign Relations, was alluded to when he wrote this: "Mr. W. Smith, who was for many years private secretary to Billy [William Ashley] Sunday, the Evangelist, makes a statement on oath before a Notary Public of Wayne, Michigan. The statement is to the following effect: President Coolidge shortly before his term of office expired, said publicly that he did not choose to compete again for the Presidency of the United States. Shortly afterwards, Billy Sunday interviewed him. Coolidge told him that after taking office, he found himself unable to carry out his election promises or to make the slightest move towards clean government. He was forced and driven by threats, even murder-threats, to carry out the orders of the Jews. Billy Sunday made public this statement of Coolidge. There followed a general attack upon the Evangelist. Then his son was framed and committed suicide, whilst the father's death was hastened in sorrow for the loss." People who are elected into political office soon meet with the Shadow Government, the Invisible Government of America and the Western World, the real power in the world, and either accepts it or is horrified by it. John Haylan, ex-mayor of New York City, spoke of the Shadow Government, theAnglo-American Establishment whose exoteric expression is the Council on Foreign Relations, in Chicago and was quoted in the New York Times (March 27, 1927). "The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much timeliness today, for the real menace of our republic is this Invisible Government which like a Giant Octopus sprawls its slimy length over the city, STATE AND NATION. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self-created screen. It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers and every agency created for the public protection. It squirms in the jaws of darkness and thus is the better able to clutch the reins of government, secure enactment of the legislation favorable to corrupt business, violate the law with impunity, smother the press and reach into the courts. To depart from mere generalizations, let say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States Government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as well be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business. They connive at centralization of government on the theory that a small group of hand-picked, privately controlled individuals in power can be more easily handled than a larger group among whom there will most likely be men sincerely interested in public welfare. These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government."  The "small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers" is the Jewish usurers, the Rothschilds and their acolytes that are fundamental to the Evil Agenda for the Establishment of World Empire. That is, the Luciferian and Ahrimanic conspiracy to subvert Natural Moral Order on Earth orchestrated by the Cult of Evil and their spiritual leaders, the Black Adepts who have Jewry, Freemasonry, the Jesuits, the Vatican and other power structures of any merit, by the throat.Captain Henry Hamilton Beamish founded a patriotic society called The Britons in 1919 and created the Britons Publishing Company with the aim to publish vehemently anti-Jewish tracts including The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion. In speech in New York (October 30, 1937) Beamish described the extent of the Jewish control of the precious metals trade: "The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably pollute." The growing menace of Jewish usury and the future safety of the world's nations as sovereign entities free of indebtedness to Jewish usury was known to any percipient observer of history. Leicester Fitzgerald Charles (1784-1862), the 5th earl of Harrington, who is best known as a worker with Lord Byron in the cause of Greek independence, also opposed the admission of Jewish immigrants to England. In a speech in the House of Lords, July 12, 1858 he in formed the House he did so because: "They are the great moneylenders and loan contractors of the world ... The consequence is that the nations of the world are groaning under heavy systems of taxation and national debt. They have ever been the greatest enemies of freedom." Mark Twain the American writer and humorist best known for his novels about Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, had certain opinions on the Jews that were far from wry. Twain was the nom de plume of Samuel Langhorne Clemens (1835-1910) whose honest assessment of the "Jewish Problem"has, as is the case with many famous writers and others sharing these convictions, been airbrushed from history. Twain's essay called "Concerning the Jews" appeared the book The Man that Corrupted Hadleybury & other Stories, which after his death his publishers were instructed to delete. The essay appeared in Harper's Monthly Magazine (September 1899) and it included these observations on this most weighty of world problems:
In all ages, Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poorhouse. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine. Protestants have persecuted Catholics - but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants - bit they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world's attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event ... I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy. You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Cyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the United States was 250,000 I wrote the editor and explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that, and that his figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics." Warner Sombart, the 20th century German economist is helpful on the matter of usury and the penchant of Jews to practice it.
Recognising the crucial role of the Ashkenazi dynasty called Rothschild in the international octopus termed "international banking" (which is effectively Jewish usury writ large) is essential to a proper understanding of the Evil Agenda. It is also paramount to understanding history and the unfolding events yet to come. The Jewish Encyclopedia (1902) is instructive on this matter: "The financial career of the Rothschilds is the key to the history of the Jewish Banking in the nineteenth century... The plan adopted by him of establishing branches in the more important European capitals, over which he placed his sons, was followed by other Jewish banking-houses ... the influence of Jews on Banking... was due to the preliminary advantage given to them by their international position." The Rothschild plan of establishing local banking branches in European cities was adopted by other Ashkenazi Jewish families such as the Lazards, Leobs, Sterns, Speyers, Seligmans and Warburgs. It was these families that spread around the world creating the Jewish octopus that is an essential component of the Evil Agenda, which is the Great Conspiracy against God brought to Earth. Frederic Morton was the official biographer of this dynasty and in his book, The Rothschilds, he gives a sympathetic account of the clan. However, the weight of evidence compelled him to allude to the sinister role of the family in the secular affairs of Europe: "For the last one hundred and fifty years, the history of the House of Rothschild has been to an amazing degree the backstage history of Western Europe ... Because of their success in making loans not to individuals but to nations, they reaped huge profits ... Someone once said that the wealth of Rothschild consists of the bankruptcy of nations." The Jew Otto Weininger (1880–1903) who converted to Christianity, was an honest man who is superciliously called a "self-hating Jew" by Zionists and there supporters who cite his book,Geschlecht und Charakter (Sex and Character, 1903), as a fruitful source for anti-Semitic propagandists. Weininger explained why a plethora of Jews are communists:  "Communism is not only a national belief but it implies the giving up of real property especially of landed property, and the Jews, being international, have never acquired the taste for real property. They prefer money, which is an instrument of power." William Morris Hughes (1864-1952), Premier of Australia, Saturday Evening Post (June 19, 1919) "The Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not a gold field or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does not pay them a heavy tribute. They are the real owners of the antipodean continent. What is the good of our being a wealthy nation, if the wealth is all in the hands of German Jews?" These are just a sample of the many condemnations of the growing menace of Jewish economic and political power and the Jewish usurer within Christendom. Pre-eminent amongst these was the Rothschild Dynasty, the nexus of this Evil. |
"It is really time to give up once and for all the legend according to which the Jews were obliged during the European middle ages, and above all 'since the Crusades,' to devote themselves to usury because all others professions were closed to them. The 2000 year old history of Jewish usury previous to the Middle Ages suffices to indicate the falseness of this historic conclusion. But even in that which concerns the Middle Ages and modern times the statements of official historiography are far from agreeing with the reality of the facts. It is not true that all careers in general were closed to the Jews during the middle ages and modern times, but they preferred to apply themselves to the lending of money on security. This is what Bucher has proved for the town of Frankfort-on-the-Maine, and it is easy to prove it for many other towns and other countries. Here is irrefutable proof of the natural tendencies of the Jews for the trade of money-lenders; in the Middle Ages and later we particularly see governments striving to direct the Jews towards other careers without succeeding."
"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves" 
"The Talmud has been the banner which has served as a rallying sign to the Jews, dispersed in diverse countries; it has maintained the unity of Judaism … The Talmud must not be regarded as an ordinary work, composed of twelve volumes; it posies absolutely no similarity to any other literary production, but forms, without any figure of speech, a world of its own, which must be judged by its peculiar laws. The Talmud contains much that is frivolous of which it treats with great gravity and seriousness; it further reflects the various superstitious practices and views of its Persian
"
"The moral charge of the anti-Semite
"But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a prince or magistrate a thousand florins, they extort twenty thousand from the subjects in payment. We must ever keep on guard against them."
"In the US cotton states, after the war... the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes' wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro's share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew. The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm - like Joseph. In the England of John's time, everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later. |
No comments:
Post a Comment