Remote Mind Control - Reach Out and Touch Someone

Remote Mind Control - Reach Out and Touch Someone

by Steven J. Smith from Electrogravitics Website   Introduction Since the dawn of civilization, governments have sought means to manipulate the thoughts and perceptions of its citizens. For example, every dictator wants to feel safe from, and loved by, those he dictates to. Even democratic governments use the techniques of public relations, spin doctoring, and press conferences, to shape the perceptions and opinions of their constituency. These techniques are so widespread that most human languages have a word dedicated to its description. In English, that word is "propaganda". The reason for this emphasis on human thought and perceptual management is quite simple. It takes far less effort to change someone's mind, than to change their living, working, or economic conditions. Furthermore, since the citizenry always out number those who exercise authority, it is critical that a majority of the people are satisfied with their leadership, or at least believe that no better alternative is available. Any government that fails to follow this maxim, be it a democracy, republic, monarchy, military junta, or dictatorship, is doomed to a quick and ignominious demise. It follows that ALL governments have an intense interest in, and are willing to expend vast sums of money on, ANY method or technology that holds the promise of enhancing the manipulation of human thought and/or perception. With the rise of competitive nation states and international trade, a second application for human perceptual/opinion management has emerged. The use of propaganda to modify the perceptions and opinions within neighboring nation states, and thereby gain some political, economic, or military advantage, generally to the detriment of those who are manipulated. In the 20th century, a new and novel avenue for manipulating the human mind made its first appearance. The use of EM (electromagnetic) energy to directly modify human thought process. Its first application was electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) also known as electro-shock treatment. While being a crude, brute force method, it none the less opened the door to more tantalizing and subtle possibilities. What follows is a detailed exposé on the development, deployment, and ongoing use, of a covert EM mind control technology that spans the entire planet. You already know its name, if not its capabilities. You call it the Cell Phone Network...   Early developments Starting in the 1950s, working under the now infamous MK Ultra project, dozens of government grants were awarded for research into different aspects of human thought and/or perceptual manipulation. Some of these grants involved the development and testing of psychoactive drugs (LSD for instance). Other grants involved the physical modification of the human brain via surgery. Still other grants involved the use of EM energy to alter brain chemistry, with the ultimate goal being covert injection of perceptions or thoughts directly into the human mind. It is this last category of research that we shall focus upon in this paper. It is unlikely that we'll ever know the true extent of, or the full results derived from, human mind control research conducted under the auspices of MK Ultra. However all is not lost, there are non-classified research papers from that era. Also a body of circumstantial evidence exists, that can be used to gain further insight into the subject. And of course, we have the fully deployed remote mind control system itself, available for our review and analysis. All we have to do is connect the dots... Lets start with a 60 year old piece of circumstantial evidence. During the development and deployment of Radar (in WWII), there were reports from radar technicians of auditory stimulus (artificial sounds) coincident with exposure to microwave radiation. It was generally assumed that mechanical movement within the ear or surrounding bone structure, created by rapid changes in temperature from exposure to microwaves, was the most likely cause. However, when deaf subjects also reported "hearing" microwaves, it became clear that a more subtle mechanism or phenomena must be responsible for the effect.   Allen H. Frey Cornell University (Ithaca New York), 1962. Allen H. Frey publishes a research paper in the Journal of Applied Physiology entitled, "Human auditory system response to Modulated electromagnetic energy". In his paper Mr. Frey describes the use of EM energy at average power levels measured in microwatts per square centimeter. I quote directly from his research paper: The perception of various sounds can be induced in clinically deaf, as well as normal, human subjects at a distance of inches up to thousands of feet from the transmitter. With somewhat different transmitter parameters, we can induce the perception of severe buffeting of the head, without such apparent vestibular symptoms as dizziness or nausea. Changing transmitter parameters again, one can induce a "pins-and-needles" sensation. The transmitter modulation method employed in Mr. Frey's experiments was "pulse modulation", later known as digital modulation (below figure). A further observation by Mr. Frey is relevant to this discussion. The EM frequency spectrum for greatest absorption by the human head, and therefore lowest threshold of auditory perception. In other words, what part of the EM spectrum is most efficient (requires the least transmitted power) to produce an auditory response? Referring to Mr. Frey's paper, the graph in Fig. 5 (below) indicates the frequency spectrum from 500 Mhz to 5000 Mhz is most efficient, with peak efficiency near 1000 Mhz. View a full copy of Allen H. Frey's research paper.   Cell Phone frequency spectrums The frequency spectrums assigned to the Cell Phone Network fall within 840 to 960 Mhz (low band) and 1710 to 2170 Mhz (high bands). Figure 1 is a reproduction of Mr. Frey's graph, with the positions of cell phone frequency bands outlined in red. Figure 1   As you can see, the frequency bands assigned by the FCC (federal communications commission) for use by Cell Phone Networks are at or near the peak of Mr. Frey's graph (showing most efficient absorption of EM energy by the human head), a graph taken from a 40+ year old research paper entitled: "Human auditory system response to Modulated electromagnetic energy". What a remarkable coincidence! Or is it? As a side note, the frequency assigned for use by microwave ovens (2450 Mhz) is also in this same part of the EM spectrum.   Cell Phone base transceiver stations Everybody's seen them and hates them. They dot the urban landscape like a plague, and they seem to pop up like weeds. I'm talking about Cell Phone towers (figure 2). These towers are just the most visible part of a Cell Phone BTS (Base Transceiver Station). At the bottom of each tower is a small building that houses the actual BTS electronics. Figure 2, a typical Cell Phone BTS tower (picture courtesy of tuberose.com)   One might assume that each Cell Phone conversation (channel) has an independent transmitter dedicated (or assigned) for the duration of the call. In reality three sets of broadband transmitters known as an MCPA (Multi-Carrier Power Amplifier) are used, with each Cell Phone conversation (channel) summed together with other Cell Phone conversations (channels), and the entire group broadcast (transmitted) by a particular MCPA set. The reason three MCPA sets are used is that most Cell Phone BTS sites divide their coverage area into three 120 degree sectors, with each MCPA set assigned to one particular sector. These 120 degree coverage sectors are why the Cell Phone BTS tower has that distinctive triangular antenna arrangement (as shown above). Since each MCPA set handles all the Cell Phone conversations for a 120 degree coverage sector, it follows that although the transmitted power for any particular Cell Phone conversation is specified as 10 watts, the TOTAL power output of an MPCA set ranges from 180 watts to 360 watts. Furthermore, the antenna configuration shapes (or focuses) the radiated EM pattern such that the total ERP (effective radiated power) ranges from 9,000 watts to 18,000 watts per 120 degree coverage sector (17db or 50x antenna gain). Therefore the total ERP for a Cell Phone BTS site (360 degree coverage) is on the order of 27,000 to 54,000 watts! And of course there are multiple Cell Phone companies, each with its own network of BTS sites. Consequently any particular urban area will be subjected to EM radiation of approximately 81,000 to 216,000 watts (3 to 4 cell phone companies). To put this in perspective, the average AM radio station transmitter is 50,000 watts. Product specification sheet for a typical MCPA Product specification sheet for a typical Cell Phone BTS antenna Under normal operation, each Cell Phone company uses a different portion of the Cell Phone Network frequency spectrum. However the actual frequencies used are determined by computer controlled DSP (digital signal processors) which like any computer controlled device, can be reprogrammed in fractions of a second. The transmitted signal uses TDMA (time division multiple access) or CDMA (code division multiple access) encoding. Both encoding methods produce a series of digital (on-off) pulses, just like Mr. Frey's original experiments (see above). It would seem the modern Cell Phone BTS is tailor made to reproduce Mr. Frey's experimental results.   Touch someone Modern radar systems employ a non-mechanical steering technique known as a phased array. Essentially, a set of independently controlled microwave transmitters are synchronized such that their signals will combine constructively at one particular location, while canceling at other locations (figure 3). Figure 3, phased array radar (courtesy of USN)   An easy way to visualize this technique is to imagine ripples, caused by dropping several small pebbles into a lake at slightly different locations and times. If done precisely, the peaks of the ripples would all combine at one location. While at other locations, the peak from one ripple would combine with the trough of another, thereby canceling each other. In a similar manner, the EM radiation (electromagnetic waves) from multiple BTS sites could be synchronized to create a large effect at one particular location. When combined with GPS (global positioning satellites), targeting would be very precise. In practical terms, an agent provocateur (CIA, NSA, or DIA - take your choice) would use a computer equipped with a modem or internet connection to access a special phone number, then enter the target coordinates. The Cell Phone network would be reprogrammed to bring all DSP's of BTS sites near the target location into synchronized phase with each other, and to transmit in a single narrow frequency spectrum, thereby allowing up to 200,000 watts of microwave radiation to be targeted at the unsuspecting victim. Optimally, this would take place between 11:00PM and 5:00AM because the Cell Phone Network call traffic is minimal during these hours. A further refinement of targeting capabilities took place in 2002, when Lucent Technologies announced "per-user intelligent antenna processing". With this technique, and I quote: The base station sends a separate, dedicated, narrower beam to each active user, which adaptively follows them as they move through the base station's coverage area. In other words, a BTS site equipped with this technology can focus a narrow "beam" of microwave energy at a particular cell phone, and will "follow" that cell phone as it moves from one location to another. View the Lucent Technologies intelligent antenna processing press release.   Such a nice boy His mother said, "he was such a nice boy, he never caused any trouble". Until he walked into a fast food restaurant, pulled out a gun, and started shooting everyone in sight. Sadly, he also shot himself, so now we'll never know why he committed such a shocking criminal act. Sound familiar? Of course it does. These days, it happens with depressing regularity. Then there was the Texas mother who drowned her children in the bathtub. She said, "the voice of god told me to do it". Psychologists tell us these seemingly random acts of violence result from economic pressures and breakdowns in inter-personal relationships, caused by the stress of modern society. I contend what we are witnessing in these wonton acts of violence, is nothing less than experimental tests of remote mind control, accomplished using the Cell Phone BTS sites to inject post hypnotic commands directly into the human mind. How do I support this conclusion? Synthesizing the human voice from a digital noise source is proven technology, dating back to the 1960s (Bell Labs 1962). The technique is called Formant Synthesis, and was used in the movie 2001, when HAL 9000 sang "Daisy". The Cell Phone transmission method uses digital pulses, and according to Mr. Frey's observations, the perceived sound most closely matched that of the EM modulation i.e. a series of digital pulses. As any audio engineer will attest, such a series of digital pulses, when reproduced by an audio amplifier, are perceived as a "buzzing" noise, just as required for input to Formant Synthesis of the human voice. It is quite reasonable to assume that in the 40+ years since Mr. Frey published his paper, use of digitally modulated EM energy to inject the auditory perception of human voices, directly into the human mind, has been perfected. Especially when you consider the value any government would place on such technology. Sleep learning, also known as hypnopaedia, is another proven technology with roots dating back to the 1950s. Spoken phrases are repeated over and over, while the person sleeps, which then facilitate recall when the subject is awake. Many believe hypnopaedia is not very effective, since the memories are not fully integrated into the subjects general conscious state. However, from the perspective of injecting posthypnotic suggestions to perform violent criminal acts, this supposed drawback is actually beneficial because it allows the person to disconnect or disassociate form performance of the criminal activity. This leads to another common thread among many contemporary crimes of violence. i.e. when questioned, the suspect said: "it was like I was watching someone else commit the crime". The technique of hypnopaedia could be further enhanced by use of EM modulation methods that induce an emotional bias or hormonal response in conjunction with the posthypnotic suggestion, thereby creating trauma based imprinting of the suggestion. The common name for trauma based imprinting is Brain Washing. While there is no direct evidence of Cell Phone BTS sites being used in the manner described herein. As I have so amply shown, the BTS site architecture and capabilities are a perfect match to the required specifications of a fully functional mind control network.  And when considered in the context of government propensity to coerce rather than cajole citizen behavior, it is hard to imagine that if such mind control technology is feasible, that it was not built into the Cell Phone BTS sites. Article on Speech Synthesis, including the Formant technique Article on Sleep Learning American foreign policy It is a well known fact (at least outside of America) that American foreign policy is dedicated to the manipulation and economic subjugation of other sovereign nations. Furthermore, while American foreign policy favors democracies, dictatorships and military juntas are also routine recipients of American foreign aid and trade concessions. Next, according to the CIA World Fact Book, most third world and developing nations have more Cell Phones in use than conventional land line phones. The reason being that Cell Phone Networks require less installation, and incur less maintenance costs. Now consider a hypothetical dictatorship. The dictator is receiving so called American foreign aid (which he's depositing in numbered Swiss bank accounts). In return, he's allowing American multinational corporations to exploit his nations natural resources, with complete disregard for the environmental damage, and consequent human suffering caused by such exploitation. As the plight of these people deteriorates, how is this dictator (and his American backers) going to keep the subjugated populace from rising up, and deposing the dictator? American supplied guns (and military advisors) worked well in the past, but such bellicose behavior is frowned upon in this enlightened, post millennium era. Suppose instead the Cell Phone BTS sites are used every night to inject hypnotic suggestions of tranquility and well being, directly into the minds of a sleeping populace. But what if, despite the best efforts at population mind control, some opposition leader should arise to challenge the despotic rule of our hypothetical dictator? His mother said, "he was such a nice boy, never caused any trouble". Until he picked up a gun, and assassinated the wildly popular opposition leader during a political rally in the capital city today. When questioned by the authorities he is reported to have said, "the voice of god told me to do it". Later, in a written press release, the local representative from the U.N. High Commission on Human Rights said he is investigating possible involvement by government secret police, but so far no proof has been found. The White House press secretary also issued a statement on behalf of the President, strongly condemning the incident as a senseless act of violence, and reaffirming the President's unwavering commitment to democracy, the rule of law, and universal human rights... Of course if our hypothetical dictator should ever decide to double cross America, and cut a better deal with the Europeans or China, the Cell Phone BTS sites will transmit hypnotic suggestions of discontent and anger. Then within a month or two, the White House press secretary will be issuing another statement on behalf of the President, asking for calm during this troubling time of transition, and pledging support for the new leader.   Beyond voices Mr. Frey's paper describes two other (non-auditory) phenomena that can be evoked by modulated EM energy.  The perception of severe head buffeting, and the sensation of "pins-and-needles". In the context of coercing specific behavioral response, both phenomena would be useful in and of them selves. However, beyond their direct usefulness, these two phenomena imply the possibility of a much wider constellation of hallucinatory sensations. Furthermore, the autonomic feedback loop from sensory to motor nervous system networks within the mammalian brain, would indicate that remote control of musculature is also a distinct possibility. What follows is based on reports from targeted subjects. Physical sleep disturbances: Physical restlessness. Inability to get, or stay comfortable. Localized physical hot spots, generally discovered when getting out of, or returning to bed in the middle of the night. Waking up feeling dehydrated, or with very dry mouth, or sinuses. Startling awake for no apparent cause. Sometimes accompanied by the impression that someone had just spoken. Sweating, for no apparent reason, sometimes in unusual patterns. For instance, only on one leg or arm. Muscle twitch similar to the involuntary knee jerk elicited by a doctor during examination, but involving every muscle in a leg or arm, or sometimes the whole body in a single massive spasm. Muscle rigidity, often accompanied by whole body muscle tremors. Mental sleep disturbances: Disruption of REM sleep over multiple nights, leading to overall decline in physical health. Dream hijacking. Having a dream suddenly change from pleasant to frightening or threatening. Up-Down syndrome. Getting up because you can't sleep, and then immediately starting to yawn because you're tired. With pattern repeating multiple times in a single night. Waking up with general or specific feelings of fear, dread or anger, and no memory of a cause or reason for such feelings. Waking up from a dream in which you did something, or acted in ways that are contrary to your normal behavior. Sometimes accompanied by feelings of shame, or self loathing. The above lists are NOT exhaustive, but merely intended to illustrate the types of physical and/or mental disturbances that can be triggered by modulated EM energy, when used as a covert weapon. Defense lawyers, when confronted with a defendant who's actions seem completely at odds with their previous patterns of behavior, should carefully question their client as to any recent sleep disturbances they may have experienced. Furthermore, a defendants claim of hearing voices that compelled them to commit a criminal act, should not be lightly dismissed, especially if a clinical examination of defendant shows no sign of mental defect. In such cases, hypnotic regression may prove useful in uncovering the root causes of their aberrant criminal behavior. Psychologists, and psychiatrists should also take the time to familiarize themselves with this new and sinister form of induced mental illness. It just may be that your mentally disturbed patient of today who is hearing voices in their head, will become tomorrows mass murderer.   Countermeasures The obvious solution to covert attack by targeted microwave energy is metallic shielding. While several companies offer products specifically intended to shield against microwave energy, ordinary aluminum foil works very well, and is much less expensive. Furthermore, at least one of the companies that offer microwave shielding products is owned by individuals with ties to the government intelligence community (CIA,NSA, DIA), and therefore should be carefully avoided. Another useful shielding material is fine mesh window screening, however make sure it is metallic, and NOTplastic. There are two basic approaches to EM energy shielding. Whole room shielding Selective shielding Whole room shielding is by far the preferred solution, but more expensive to implement. Selective shielding is less expensive, but also less convenient and depending on the exact nature of its construction, less effective. Whole room shielding entails covering all walls, and depending on physical location, the floor and ceiling, with aluminum foil or fine mesh window screening. Selective shielding entails the use of folding room dividers covered in aluminum foil or fine mesh window screening, and placed around the bed. One other method is suggested by figure 6, in Mr. Frey's paper. That is the use of a head shield. While portrayed as a "tin foil hat" in the popular media and belittling jokes, the use of fine mesh window screening, sandwiched between two light weight cloth stocking caps would be far more comfortable, and far less noticeable by others. This method would be useful in locations and circumstances where other shielding methods discussed herein are impractical (a motel room for instance). However, the author must caution that use of a head shield is far less effective than other methods discussed in this section. Another useful adjunct to EM shielding is a microwave leakage meter. These meters are used to measure the level of EM leakage from devices such as microwave ovens. Many consumer versions are available for less than $50. However, since the meter is intended to measure leakage from microwave ovens operating at 2450 Mhz, rather than Cell Phone Networks operation at slightly lower frequencies, the meter should be tested by holding it near an operating Cell Phone during a call. A more accurate (and expensive) version known as an RF field meter is available from Scientific Meters, for $320. An RF field meter, with an audio alarm function that could be set to trigger at a specific threshold level would be ideal. The meter could be located next to the bed, and would wake the victim up, at the commencement of any directed EM energy attack. In closing, during the last 10 years, there has been a plethora of whacko jokes, derogatory comments and movie plots involving the use of tin foil hats. These should be viewed as an attempt to discredit the whole idea of attack by directed EM energy. Comments and movies of this type should also be considered as yet another piece of circumstantial evidence that such attacks are in fact, taking place on a daily basis. And finally, that those individuals and organizations responsible for attacks by directed EM energy, also exercise influence over the mass media, and other forums of public opinion.   Further investigations A consequence of flooding the urban environment with high energy microwave radiation is the steady rise of non-specific sleep disorders in the general population. This may be an unintended side effect, or it may be quite intentional. Either way, a study of sleep disturbances, correlated with Cell Phone BTS site distribution would prove very helpful. The study should also explore the temporal relationship between Cell Phone BTS site growth, and the rise of reported sleep disturbances. Furthermore, it is the author's conjecture that a positive correlation between leukemia and Cell Phone BTS site geographic and temporal growth will also be evident. Another useful study would be the correlation between the rise of violent criminal activity and Cell Phone BTS site density. Both geographic and temporal correlations should be considered. It is the authors opinion that a positive correlation will be found. For those organizations that have the technical capabilities, reverse engineering the BTS computer firmware would lead to incontrovertible proof that Cell Phone BTS sites are in fact mind control weapons. Reverse engineering would also provide the necessary information to block the weapon functions, while leaving the communications functions intact. This project would be a good undertaking for some enterprising company in an emerging nation (India for instance). They need not worry about legal liability arising from charges of patent or copyright infringement. Charges of this type would inevitably lead to disclosure of the pertinent facts, and it is most unlikely that any corporation would wish to take public responsibility for developing such a vile and pernicious weapon. Several recent incidents within the EU would seem to warrant further investigation. The unexpected and widespread uprising of disgruntled youth in France is a good example, especially given the strained diplomatic relations with America, over the Iraq invasion.   Summary The development and deployment of a remote mind control network, based on Cell Phone BTS technology as described herein, does not require some grand conspiracy with hundreds of corporations, and thousands of individuals. The number of people who were directly involved in the development is most likely less than 100. The vast majority of individuals who manufacture, market, sell, and install Cell Phone BTS sites are ignorant of the networks true capabilities. It is unknown how many people within the American intelligence community (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc.) that have direct knowledge of the systems capabilities. However, given the operational requirements, this number may range upwards of 10,000. It is also not known how many individuals in other countries (such as those within the EU intelligence communities) are cognizant of the remote mind control capabilities built into Cell Phone BTS sites. While many will choose to view this paper as an exercise in paranoid fantasy, others will recognize symptoms or behaviors I have described, and take the appropriate precautions. Still others will read this document, and over time, as they watch events unfold in the world around them, come to know the truth of my words. Despots and dictators will desire to possess this technology, while the free and righteous will desire to ban its use. By your actions, each of you will help create mankind's future, and each of you will have to live within that future you have created. Choose wisely...   Disclaimer ALL information contained herein is derived from public sources, widely accepted scientific principles, and/or authors first hand experience. The author has NO written or verbal agreement with ANY governmental agency forbidding disclosure of the information contained herein. In disclosing this information, the author is exercising his right to free speech as a private citizen of the United States of America. While the author advocates the discovery and disclosure of Cell Phone based remote mind control technology, NO ATTEMPT should be made to interfere in any way whatsoever with the personnel and/or operations of said technology. The proper method for achieving discontinuance of these activities is through court ordered injunctive relief.

POLICE STATE BRAIN IMPLANTS FOR EVERYONE BY 2017!!!! - YouTube

BRAIN MIND READING IMPLANTS FOR EVERYONE BY 2017!!!! - YouTube



POLICE STATE BRAIN IMPLANTS FOR EVERYONE BY 2017!!!! - YouTube



What is a Targeted Individual? 1

What’s Happening to Targeted Individuals? 4
1. Choose the Target 4
2. Take Their Privacy 5
3. Monitor Communications 6
4. Take Their Income 6
5. Take Their Home 6
6. Take Their Family 7
7. Kill Their Pets 8
8. Put Them in a Mental Hospital 8
9. Destruction of Electronic Equipment 9
10. Financial Burden of Repairing and Replacing
Personal Items, Electronics, Appliances
and Vehicles 10
11. Surveillance 10
12. Stalking 12
13. Noise Campaign 14
14. Poisoning and Drugging 15
15. Radiation 15
16. Implants 17
17. Medical Care 19
18. Biological Weapons 20
19. Harassment 21
20. Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) 22
21. Sleep Deprivation 23 Why is this Happening? 24
1. The Agenda of the New World Order 24
More Lies and Coverups 24
2. Perfect the Human Race for Some 25
The Georgia Guidestones 26 3. Eliminate Opponents 27 A Battle for the Mind 27
Mind Control Technology 28
Tip Guide for Targets 29
Shielding 29-30

Military Use of Silent Sound - Mind Control Weapons

Military Use of Silent Sound - Mind Control Weapons

by Judy Wall excerpts from Nexus Volume 5, Issue 6 October/November 1998 from Raven1 Website recovered trough WayBackMachine Website About the Author: Judy Wall is Editor and Publisher of Resonance, the Newsletter of the Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group. pp.11--13,15-16 This article shows clearly the military's intent to use every possible thought-influencing technology. This technology is largely classified but there are leaks, like this article. We involuntary test subjects can tell you from first hand experience that far more invasive devices now exist. This article represents one of the two parallel "tracks" on which thought-influencing technology is being used and further developed: Radio frequency signals, based on the WW II phenomenon called "radar hearing" Ultrasound signals, which can be transmitted through the air or piggybacked on to radio/TV signals PSY-OPS WEAPONRY USED IN THE PERSIAN GULF WAR For years, rumors have persisted that the United States Department of Defense has been engaged in research and development of ultra-sophisticated mind- altering technology. Confirmation of this came to me recently in the form of two ITV News Bureau Ltd (London) wire service bulletins.[1]   The March 23, 1991 news-brief, “High-Tech Psychological Warfare Arrives in the Middle East”, describes a US Psychological Operations (PsyOps) tactic directed against Iraqi troops in Kuwait during Operation Desert Storm. The maneuver consisted of a system in which subliminal mind-altering technology was carried on standard radiofrequency broadcasts. The March 26, 1991 news-brief states that among the standard military planning groups in the centre of US war planning operations at Riyadh was “an unbelievable and highly classified PsyOps program utilizing ‘silent sound’ techniques”. The opportunity to use this method occurred when Saddam Hussein’s military command-and-control system was destroyed. The Iraqi troops were then forced to use commercial FM radio stations to carry encoded commands, which were broadcast on the 100 MHz frequency. The US PsyOps team set up its own portable FM transmitter, utilizing the same frequency, in the deserted city of Al Khafji. This US transmitter overpowered the local Iraqi station. Along with patriotic and religious music, PsyOps transmitted “vague, confusing and contradictory military orders and information”. Subliminally, a much more powerful technology was at work: a sophisticated electronic system to ‘speak’ directly to the mind of the listener, to alter and entrain his brainwaves, to manipulate his brain’s electroencephalograph i.e. (EEG) patterns and artificially implant negative emotional states-feelings of fear, anxiety, despair and hopelessness. This subliminal system doesn’t just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it; it implants that emotion in their minds.[2] I noticed that the ITV wire service was from outside the United States. Readers of Resonance may recall that in the Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline in issue no. 29, reference is made to the documentary video, Waco: The Big Lie Continues, which contained video footage of three EM weapons. This segment of the film was from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). I wondered if there was any significance to this. At the library I pulled up back issues of my local newspaper for the same time-period of the Gulf War to see what the American wire services had said, if anything, about the use of this special PsyOps weapon. There was nothing said about it directly, but three news articles seemed related. In a news release from Associated Press during the same timeframe of the Gulf War truce, I read: “The American pilot who shot down the second Iraqi warplane in 48 hours said Friday that continued Iraqi flights suggested that US warnings were not filtering down to Iraqi pilots… He said he hopes Saddam gets the message now. ‘It’s really too bad that these people have to die for their unwillingness to heed our warnings... What I really think is, they don’t communicate down to the people,’ he said. ‘If they have a communications problem, I suggest they fix it.’” [3] That may have been coincidence but two earlier news articles, dated March 1, 1991, apparently have a common origin with the ITV news bulletin. The first article[4] tells us that approximately 100 members of the US 101st Airborne Division, fluent in Arabic, talked the enemy into surrendering. These soldiers rode in the Apache helicopter gunships that were involved in the longest helicopter-borne assault in history. They told the Iraqi troops that they would be slaughtered if they didn’t give up. “They got the point,” one soldier is quoted as saying. This all sounds very unremarkable, except when you read the editor’s note: “The following dispatch was subject to US military censorship.” Now why would they want to censor such a mundane tactic, except out of embarrassment that the US Army fighting forces had fallen to the level of a cheer-leading squad?... in which case they would have nixed the thing entirely. But upon re-reading the article, we may pick out certain key phrases: “He [the soldier interviewed] was one of dozens of Arabic speakers that played a key role in the allied ground attack against Iraq, and part of an attempt by the US Army to use finesse, intelligence work and tactics to complement brute strength.” If we fill in the missing blanks with such descriptions as “the megaphone was used to direct psychoacoustic frequencies that engaged the neural networks of the enemy’s brain, causing him to think any thought and feel any emotion that the Americans chose to lay on him”, then it starts to make sense. And it would no longer seem so surprising that one soldier could talk 450 enemy soldiers into surrendering. The possibilities are there, and, as the next article[5] documents, that is exactly what happened. Iraqi troops gave up en masse. We quote: “They were surrendering in droves, almost too fast for us to keep up with...” “...two Iraqi majors, both brigade commanders, who gave up their entire units...” “...one of them gave up to an RPV [remotely piloted vehicle]. Here’s this guy with his hands up, turning in a circle to give himself up to a model airplane with a camera in it.” Irrational? Not if there was also a voice being beamed into his head from that little flying toy, saying, "Give up, give up!" Otherwise, how do we account for the editor’s note at the beginning of the article: “The following is based on pool dispatches that were subject to military censorship.” Without that note, we could smugly think that the Iraqi soldiers were cowards or crazy, but why censor that idea? MIND CONTROL WITH SILENT SOUNDS The mind-altering mechanism is based on a subliminal carrier technology: the Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS), sometimes called “S-quad” or “Squad”. It was developed by Dr Oliver Lowery of Norcross, Georgia, and is described in US Patent #5,159,703, “Silent Subliminal Presentation System”, dated October 27, 1992. The abstract for the patent reads: “A silent communications system in which non-aural carriers, in the very low or very high audio-frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum are amplitude- or frequency-modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers. The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the listener.” According to literature by Silent Sounds, Inc., it is now possible, using supercomputers, to analyze human emotional EEG patterns and replicate them, then store these “emotion signature clusters” on another computer and, at will, “silently induce and change the emotional state in a human being”. Silent Sounds, Inc. states that it is interested only in positive emotions, but the military is not so limited. That this is a US Department of Defense project is obvious. Edward Tilton, President of Silent Sounds, Inc., says this about S-quad in a letter dated December 13, 1996: “All schematics, however, have been classified by the US Government and we are not allowed to reveal the exact details... ... we make tapes and CDs for the German Government, even the former Soviet Union countries! All with the permission of the US State Department, of course... The system was used throughout Operation Desert Storm (Iraq) quite successfully.” The graphic illustration, “Induced Alpha to Theta Biofeedback Cluster Movement”, which accompanies the literature, is labeled #AB 116-394-95 UNCLASSIFIED” and is an output from “the world’s most versatile and most sensitive electroencephalograph (EEG) machine”. It has a gain capability of 200,000, as compared to other EEG machines in use which have gain capability of approximately 50,000. It is software-driven by the “fastest of computers” using a noise-nulling technology similar to that used by nuclear submarines for detecting small objects underwater at extreme range.[6] The purpose of all this high technology is to plot and display a moving cluster of periodic brainwave signals. The illustration shows an EEG display from a single individual, taken of left and right hemispheres simultaneously. The readout from the two sides of the brain appear to be quite different, but in fact are the same (discounting normal left-right brain variations). CLONING THE EMOTIONS By using these computer-enhanced EEGs, scientists can identify and isolate the brain’s low-amplitude “emotion signature clusters”, synthesize them and store them on another computer. In other words, by studying the subtle characteristic brainwave patterns that occur when a subject experiences a particular emotion, scientists have been able to identify the concomitant brainwave pattern and can now duplicate it. “These clusters are then placed on the Silent Sound[TM] carrier frequencies and will silently trigger the occurrence of the same basic emotion in another human being!” SYSTEM DELIVERY AND APPLICATIONS There is a lot more involved here than a simple subliminal sound system. There are numerous patented technologies which can be piggybacked individually or collectively onto a carrier frequency to elicit all kinds of effects. There appear to be two methods of delivery with the system. One is direct microwave induction into the brain of the subject, limited to short-range operations. The other, as described above, utilizes ordinary radio and television carrier frequencies. Far from necessarily being used as a weapon against a person, the system does have limitless positive applications. However, the fact that the sounds are subliminal makes them virtually undetectable and possibly dangerous to the general public. In more conventional use, the Silent Sounds Subliminal System might utilize voice commands, e.g., as an adjunct to security systems. Beneath the musical broadcast that you hear in stores and shopping malls may be a hidden message which exhorts against shoplifting. And while voice commands alone are powerful, when the subliminal presentation system carries cloned emotional signatures, the result is overwhelming. Free-market uses for this technology are the common self-help tapes; positive affirmation, relaxation and meditation tapes; as well as methods to increase learning capabilities. In a medical context, these systems can be used to great advantage to treat psychiatric and psychosomatic problems. As a system for remediating the profoundly deaf, it is unequalled. (Promises, promises. This is the most common positive use touted for this technology over the past 30 years. But the deaf are still deaf, and the military now has a weapon to use on unsuspecting people with perfectly normal hearing.) OFFICIAL DENIALS In fact, the US Government has denied or refused to comment on mind-altering weapons for years. Only last year, US News & World Report ran an article titled “Wonder Weapons” basically a review of the new so-called ‘non-lethal’ or ‘less-than -lethal’ weapons.’ Not one word about S-quad, although the technology had been used six years earlier! Excerpts from the article read: “Says Charles Bernard, a former Navy weapons-research director: ‘I have yet to see one of these ray-gun things that actually works…” "And DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) has come to us every few years to see if there are ways to incapacitate the central nervous system remotely,’ Dr F. Terry Hambrecht, head of the Neural Prostheses Program at NIH, told US News, ‘but nothing has ever come of if,’ he said. ‘That is too science-fiction and far-fetched.”’ It may sound “science fiction and far-fetched” but it is not. However, that is just what the powers-that-be want you to believe, so as to leave them alone in their relentless pursuit of... what? The idea behind non-lethal weapons is to incapacitate the enemy without actually killing them, or, in the case of riot control or hostage situations, to disable the participants without permanent injury, preferably without their knowing it. The electromagnetic mind-altering technologies would all fall into this class of weapons, but since they are all officially non-existent, who is to decide when and where they will be used? And why should selected companies in the entertainment industry reportedly be allowed access to this technology when the very fact of its existence is denied to the general public? As recently as last month [February], this stonewall approach of total denial or silence on the subject still held fast, even toward committees of the US Congress! "The Joint Economics Committee, chaired by Jim Saxton (R-NJ), convened on February 25, 1998 for the 'Hearing on Radio Frequency Weapons and Proliferation: Potential Impact on the Economy'”. Invited testimony included statements by several authorities from the military: Dr Alan Kehs, of the US Army Laboratories, discussed the overall RF threat. Mr James O’Bryon, Deputy Director of Operational Testing and Director of live fire testing for the Office of Secretary of Defense at the Pentagon, discussed the role of Live Fire Testing and how it plays a role in testing military equipment with RF weapons. Mr David Schriner, Principal Engineer of Directed Energy Studies with Electronic Warfare Associates and recently retired as an engineer with a naval weapons testing facility, talked about the difficulty in building an RF weapon and about the terrorist threat. Dr Ira Merritt, Chief of Concepts Identification and Applications Analysis Division, Advanced Technology Directorate, Missile Defense and Space Technology Center, Huntsville, Alabama, discussed the proliferation of RF weapons primarily from the former Soviet Union. Although these statements gave information of technical interest, they are perhaps more important for the information they did not give: information on the existence of radiofrequency weapons that directly affect the human brain and nervous system. KGB PSYCHOTRONICS This technology did not spring up overnight. It has a long history of development and denials of development-by the US Government and probably half of the other governments of the world as well. We know that the former Soviet Union was actively engaged in this type of research. In a previous article we reported that during the 1970s the Soviet KGB developed a Psychotronic Influence System (PIS) that was used to turn soldiers into programmable ‘human weapons’. The system employed a combination of high-frequency radiowaves and hypnosis. The PIS project was begun in response to a similar training scheme launched in the US by President Carter, according to Yuri Malin, former security adviser to USSR President Gorbachev.[8] In my Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline[9] I covered a period of 60 years of interest and development in EM weapons—information gathered from the many articles and news clippings sent in by readers of Resonance. In my article on synthetic telepathy[10] I traced the development of the ‘voice in your head’ technology dating back to 1961, all my references coming from the open scientific literature. POWER OF THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX Jan Wiesemann has written an apt description of the situation which now exists in the United States, about the ‘forces that be’ and how the situation came about: “During the Cold War the United States not only engaged in a relatively open nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union, but also engaged in a secret race developing unconventional weapons. As the intelligence agencies (which prior to the Second World War had merely played a supporting role within the government) continued to increase their power, so did the funds spent on developing techniques designed to outsmart each other. “And as the US intelligence community began to grow, a secret culture sprang about which enabled the intelligence players to implement the various developed techniques to cleverly circumvent the democratic processes and institutions... “Like many other democracies, the US Government is made up of two basic parts the elected constituency, i.e., the various governors, judges, congressmen and the President; and the unelected bureaucracies, as represented by the numerous federal agencies. “In a well-balanced and correctly functioning democracy, the elected part of the government is in charge of its unelected bureaucratic part, giving the people a real voice in the agenda set by their government. “While a significant part of the US Government no doubt follows this democratic principle, a considerable portion of the US Government operates in complete secrecy and follows its own unaccountable agenda which, unacknowledged, very often is quite different from the public agenda.“[11] Jan goes on to quote one of the United States’ most popular war heroes: Dwight D. Eisenhower, who served as Supreme Commander of Allied Forces during World War II and was later elected 34th President of the United States. In his farewell address to the nation in 1961, President Eisenhower said: “...we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations. “This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the federal government. We recognise the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military -industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or our democratic processes.” INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS OVER NEW WEAPONS The United Nations was established in 1945 with the aim of “saving succeeding generations from the scourge of war”. In 1975 the General Assembly considered a draft first proposed by the Soviet Union: “Prohibition of the Development and Manufacture of New Types of Weapons of Mass Destruction and New Systems of Such Weapons”. In 1979 the Soviet Union added a list of some types of potential weapons of mass destruction: Radiological weapons (using radioactive materials) which could produce harmful effects similar to those of a nuclear explosion Particle beam weapons, based on charged or neutral particles, to affect biological targets Infrasonic acoustic radiation weapons Electromagnetic weapons operating at certain radio-frequency radiations which could have injurious effects on human organs.[12] In response, the US and other Western nations stalled. They gave a long, convoluted reason, but the result was the same. In an article entitled “Non-Lethal Weapons May Violate Treaties” [13] (below insert), the author notes that the Certain Conventional Weapons Convention[14] covers many of the non-conventional weapons—“those that utilize infrasound or electromagnetic energy (including lasers, microwave or radiofrequency radiation, or visible light pulsed at brainwave frequency) for their effects”. "Non-lethal" weapons may violate treaties by Barbara Hatch Rosenberg from TheBulletin Website recovered through WayBackMachine Website Development of many of the proposed weapons described on these pages has been undertaken by NATO, the United States, and probably other nations as well. Most of the weapons could be considered "pre-lethal" rather than non-lethal. They would actually provide a continuum of effects ranging from mild to lethal, with varying degrees of controllability. Serious questions arise about the legality of these expensive and highly classified development programs. Four international treaties are particularly relevant.   The Biological Weapons Convention The development of biological agents for "non-lethal" uses such as degradation of aircraft fuel, lubricants, or electrical insulation would appear to violate the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), which prohibits the development, production, or possession of biological agents that have no justification for prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful purposes. Although "protective purposes" is not defined in the treaty, by analogy with the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) it can be presumed to mean protection against dangerous biological agents. U.S. law implementing the treaty provides criminal penalties for the development or possession of "any biological agent" for use as a weapon; "biological agent" is defined to include any microorganism capable of causing "deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind; or deleterious alteration of the environment." There is no exemption for use in law enforcement.   The Chemical Weapons Convention and the Geneva Protocol The development of "non-lethal" chemical weapons, such as sedatives delivered in aerosols absorbed through the skin or supercaustics that corrode roads and tires (and inevitably also clothing, shoes, skin, and flesh), threatens to violate the Chemical Weapons Convention. The convention is expected to come into force next year. It prohibits the development, production, or retention for prohibited purposes of toxic chemicals, defined as "any chemical which through its chemical action on life processes can cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm to humans or animals." The definition would include substances such as caustics and other harmful chemicals not usually classified as poisons. The convention permits the production of toxic chemicals if they are used for peaceful purposes, as in agriculture; protective purposes (against toxic chemicals); "military purposes not connected with the use of chemical weapons and not dependent on the use of the toxic properties of chemicals as a method of warfare"; and "law enforcement including domestic riot control purposes." The third of these permissible purposes might be construed to include chemicals such as supercaustics, on the grounds that "life processes" are not the intended target, provided that use of the chemicals as weapons would entail little contact with living things. For some weapons, this would be difficult to establish. The Geneva Protocol of 1925 prohibits "the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquid materials or devices." The "or other" appears to broaden the prohibition beyond asphyxiating or toxic substances. Thus, the use in warfare of harmful chemicals such as supercaustics and sticky foams (which, in addition to forming a kind of "roach motel" for people, could act as asphyxiating agents) may be illegal, and the use of metal embrittlement agents, superlubricants, chemicals that interfere with fuel combustion, and so forth could also be questioned. Under the CWC, the fourth permissible purpose for developing chemical weapons agents-law enforcement, including domestic riot control-is the major reason currently offered for developing non-lethal weapons. This permissible purpose, however, contains an ambiguity in urgent need of clarification. "Law enforcement" is not defined in the treaty. Does it include anything more than riot control? If so, what? And what law? In contrast, the convention defines "riot control agents" narrowly and prohibits their use in warfare. Regarding law enforcement, it excludes the use of "Schedule 1" chemicals (one of several categories of chemical weapon agents) but says no more. This implies that for any law enforcement purposes other than domestic riot control, any non­Schedule 1 chemical may be developed, produced, acquired, stockpiled, or transferred as a weapon. Furthermore, although riot control agents must be declared, the treaty says nothing about declaring other agents that might be developed or held for law enforcement. In the report containing the final text of the CWC, several of the national delegations to the negotiating body pointed out the problems raised by the undefined term "law enforcement' as a permissible purpose.1 One delegation stated that "this might give rise to far-fetched interpretations of what the negotiators intended." Indeed, the three delegations that commented on this issue interpreted this permissible purpose in widely different ways: as limited to domestic actions, as applicable outside national boundaries, or as including only domestic and U.N. peacekeeping activities. Unless the CWC Preparatory Commission takes steps to define more closely and limit this wild card, it could subvert much of the intent of the convention and render its elaborate verification mechanism futile. For domestic riot control, the development of chemical agents is clearly permissible under the CWC, although their use in warfare is prohibited. Riot control agents are defined in the CWC as chemicals "which can produce rapidly in humans sensory irritation or disabling physical effects which disappear within a short time following termination of exposure." This might be true of certain sedatives, depending on the dose; it is certainly not true of corrosive chemicals or immobilizing glues. No agent that causes a deleterious effect not automatically reversible can be considered acceptable and humane for use in domestic riot control; it would be unethical to subject innocent bystanders, children, or hostages to severe psychological stress, possible permanent injury, or death. The development of chemical weapons in the guise of domestic riot control agents must not be allowed as a means of circumventing the CWC. The treaty states that every chemical held for domestic riot control purposes must be declared; the CWC Preparatory Commission needs to specify that these chemicals must fit the convention's humanitarian definition of a riot control agent.   The Certain Conventional Weapons Convention (also known as the Inhumane Weapons Convention)2 Many of the non-lethal weapons under consideration utilize infrasound or electromagnetic energy (including lasers, microwave or radio-frequency radiation, or visible light pulsed at brain-wave frequency) for their effects. These weapons are said to cause temporary or permanent blinding, interference with mental processes, modification of behavior and emotional response, seizures, severe pain, dizziness, nausea and diarrhea, or disruption of internal organ functions in various other ways. In addition, the use of high-power microwaves to melt down electronic systems would incidentally cook every person in the vicinity. Typically, the biological effects of these weapons depend on a number of variables that, theoretically, could be tuned to control the severity of the effects. However, the precision of control is questionable. The use of such weapons for law enforcement might constitute severe bodily punishment without due process. In warfare, the use of these weapons in a non-lethal mode would be analogous to the use of riot control agents in the Vietnam War, a practice now outlawed by the CWC. Regardless of the level of injury inflicted, the use of many non-lethal weapons is likely to violate international humanitarian law on the basis of superfluous suffering and/or indiscriminate effects.3 In addition, under the Certain Conventional Weapons Convention, international discussions are now under way that may lead to the development of specific new protocols covering electromagnetic weapons; a report is expected sometime next year. The current surge of interest in electromagnetic and similar technologies makes the adoption of a protocol explicitly outlawing the use of these dehumanizing weapons an urgent matter. 1. Conference on Disarmament, Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Chemical Weapons to the Conference on Disarmament, Aug. 26, 1992, Nos. 22, 25, 34 (CD/1170). 2. The full name of this treaty is "Convention on Prohibition or Restriction of the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects." 3. Louise Doswald-Beck, ed., Blinding Weapons: Reports of the Meetings of Experts Convened by the International Committee of the Red Cross on Battlefield Laser Weapons, 1989­1991 (Geneva: Internal Committee of the Red Cross, 1993)   Harlan Girard, Managing Director of the International Committee Against Offensive Microwave Weapons, told me he believes the strategy behind the government’s recent push for less-than-lethal weapons is a subterfuge. The ones that are now getting all the publicity are put up for scrutiny to get the public’s approval. The electromagnetic mind-altering technologies are not mentioned, but would be brought in later under the umbrella of less-than- lethal weapons. These weapons were recently transferred from the Department of Defense over to the Department of Justice. Why? Because there are several international treaties that specifically limit or exclude weapons of this nature from being used in international warfare. In other words, weapons that are barred from use against our country’s worst enemies (notwithstanding the fact that the US did use this weapon against Iraqi troops!) can now be used against our own citizens by the local police departments against such groups as peaceful protestors of US nuclear policies. TOWARDS GLOBAL MIND CONTROL The secrecy involved in the development of the electromagnetic mind-altering technology reflects the tremendous power that is inherent in it. To put it bluntly, whoever controls this technology can control the minds of men-all men. There is evidence that the US Government has plans to extend the range of this technology to envelop all peoples, all countries. This can be accomplished, is being accomplished, by utilizing the nearly completedHAARP project [15,16] for overseas areas and the GWEN network now in place in the US. The US Government denies all this. Dr Michael Persinger is a Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at Laurentian University, Ontario, Canada. You have met him before in the pages of Resonance where we reported on his findings that strong electromagnetic fields can affect a person’s brain. “Temporal lobe stimulation,” he said, “can evoke the feeling of a presence, disorientation, and perceptual irregularities. It can activate images stored in the subject’s memory, including nightmares and monsters that are normally suppressed.” [17] Dr Persinger wrote an article a few years ago, titled “On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms”.[18] The abstract reads: “Contemporary neuroscience suggests the existence of fundamental algorithms by which all sensory transduction is translated into an intrinsic, brain-specific code. Direct stimulation of these codes within the human temporal or limbic cortices by applied electromagnetic patterns may require energy levels which are within the range of both geomagnetic activity and contemporary communication networks. A process which is coupled to the narrow band of brain temperature could allow all normal human brains to be affected by a sub-harmonic whose frequency range at about 10 Hz would only vary by 0.1 Hz.” He concludes the article with this: “Within the last two decades a potential has emerged which was improbable, but which is now marginally feasible. This potential is the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human species, without mediation through classical sensory modalities, by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed. “The historical emergence of such possibilities, which have ranged from gunpowder to atomic fission, have resulted in major changes in the social evolution that occurred inordinately quickly after the implementation. Reduction of the risk of the inappropriate application of these technologies requires the continued and open discussion of their realistic feasibility and implications within the scientific and public domain.” It doesn’t get any plainer than that. And we do not have open discussion because the US Government has totally denied the existence of this technology. Acknowledgements I would like to give special thanks to: Jan Wiesemann for sending the Silent Sounds[TM] statement and patents which were the keystone of this article Mike Coyle, whose computer search turned up many more related patents Harlan Girard, who has provided numerous official government documents to the many who have provided newsclippings and articles, moral and financial support to Resonance, without which we’d have ceased publication long ago. Return to Saddam Hussein Return to Non-Lethal Weapons - "Psychotronics" and "Silent Sound"